From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 9 Jan 2006 20:53:08 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Local government role at federal cleanupa court ruling |
The following comes from the Energy Communities Alliance: COURT RULES LOCAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE A ROLE IN FEDERAL FACILITY CLEANUPS In an important decision for local government involvement in DOE, DOD and other federal cleanups, a Federal District Court in the Eastern District of Washington ruled that pursuant to CERCLA, local governments have legal standing to be able to participate in the planning and selection of a remedy at a CERCLA cleanup site. Specifically, local governments pursuant to CERCLA, 42 USC Section 9620(f) must be allowed to participate in the the planning and selection of the remedy at a federal facility site that is being cleaned up as a "remedial action" under CERCLA, 42 USC Section 9620. ECA and other local government groups have long maintained that local governments have a specific statutorily defined role in CERCLA cleanups at federal facility cleanup sites. CERCLA Section 9620(f) states: "(f) State and local participation The Administrator and each department, agency, or instrumentality responsible for compliance with this section shall afford to relevant State and local officials the opportunity to participate in the planning and selection of the remedial action, including but not limited to the review of all applicable data as it becomes available and the development of studies, reports, and action plans. In the case of State officials, the opportunity to participate shall be provided in accordance with section 9621 of this title." In City of Moses Lake v. United States of America, et al., the Court granted the City of Moses Lake a preliminary injunction against the United States EPA and Army Corps (the federal regulator and the federal entity cleaning up the site for the US) from formally issuing a "interim" or "proposed" cleanup plan without providing the City with 1) the opportunity to review all applicable data involving the site and 2) the ability to participate in the "decision -making" with regard to the contaminated site. ECA is developing a detailed memorandum on this case for its members. Further this case and the impact on DOE cleanups and local government involvement will be discussed at the ECA peer exchange on environmental cleanup issues on January 19 Local governments should work with their DOE site and EPA to discuss this important case and where the local governments wants to be more involved in the cleanup decision-making at the DOE site, begin to work with EPA and DOE to develop the formal role for the local governments in the decision making process. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Tinker AFB (OK) - "halo of vacant land" Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Kansas issues perchlorate fish advisory | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Tinker AFB (OK) - "halo of vacant land" Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Kansas issues perchlorate fish advisory |