From: | Christine Ziebold <c_ziebold@yahoo.com> |
Date: | 8 Apr 2006 05:32:11 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Grass Fire Burns 1,300 Acres NW of Denver |
Previous fires around Rocky Flats have liberated plutonium trapped in the prairie grass. See article below from Environmental Information Network 1993. Since the DOE "cleanup" for closure did not include remediation of the vast prairie land areas ( only land use controls...), subject to 50 years of deposition and uptake from Rocky Flats emissions, this ought to be considered be a public health threat. What's NRC doing? Never mind the Plutonium, and at least they didn't have to shut down the county airport. Christine Ziebold MD PhD MPH Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant RAB community member ----------- Grass Fire Burns 1,300 Acres Northwest of Denver Fire Is 90% Contained, Roads Reopened POSTED: 2:03 pm MDT April 2, 2006 DENVER -- A fire broke out around 2 p.m. Sunday on the northwest side of the Denver metro area, near Highways 128 and 93, in the vicinity of Rocky Flats. The fire started in Boulder County, and quickly spread into nearby Jefferson and Broomfield Counties. The fire was fueled by sustained northwest winds of 30 mph, with gusts up to 50 mph. Within minutes the flames grew to hundreds of acres, jumped Indiana Street, and moved toward the suburbs of Westminster and Broomfield. The fire prompted officials to evacuate 135 homes, affecting over 3,000 residents of the Walnut Creek Subdivision in Broomfield just after 3 pm. Evacuees were sent to the West View Recreation Center in Westminster, where the American Red Cross was stationed. Numerous roads were closed in the vicinity of the fire, including Indiana and Simms. Just before 5 pm, the evacuation order was lifted and residents were allowed back home. All roads in the fire zone have reopened. At last report, the fire had consumed 1,300 acres and was 90% contained. No structures were lost thanks to the quick action of firefighters. During the height of the fire, an air tanker was called in from Albuquerque, New Mexico to help fight the flames. The fire did not disrupt operations of the Jefferson County airport. ========================================================= ROCKY FLATS AND THE HAYSTACK FIRE Article by Susan Elofson-Hurst and Paula Elofson-Gardine On May 1, 1991, Countryside resident Tim Hites was driving west on 108th Ave. at Simms St. He saw a column of smoke that appeared to be coming from the Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Facility (RFP). Several Jefferson County Sheriff's vehicles were at that corner. Mr. Hites asked them if there was a fire at Rocky Flats. He was told that bales of hay were on fire. The fire had been set by children playing there, and not to worry about it.Mr. Hites drove out to investigate further, and discovered the fire was 1,500 feet east of Indiana Street, adjacent to the RFP east entrance. He observed West Adams County Fire Department (WACFD) personnel putting water on the fire, and digging a two foot containment ditch around the fire area. Having knowledge that the area may be contaminated with plutonium (Pu) from the RFP, Mr. Hites was concerned that the fire fighters were not wearing any protective gear or masks (Mr. Hites was a Director on the Board of the Rocky Flats Cleanup Commission at the time). Mr. Hites called Jefferson County emergency dispatch. He was told that this area was not listed on their database that determines whether a hazmat team responds. He then contacted the WACFD Lieutenant in charge. He explained that the fire area the WACFD firemen were working on, was potentially contaminated with radiotoxics from the RFP. He asserted that they should be taking precautions against inhalation of this smoke, as there were 178+ contaminated areas slated for Superfund Cleanup that included off site areas owned by the City of Broomfield, such as Great Western Reservoir. By 7:00 p.m. the same evening, Mr. Hites had gone back out to check on the situation. The fire had been left burning and unattended. The neighborhoods of Walnut Creek and Countryside, 1-1/2 miles to the east were choked with heavy, black smoke from the hay fire. The next morning, Mr. Hites called the City of Broomfield to inquire why they had not listed the property east of Rocky Flats as contaminated with the Jefferson County Hazmat Response Database. The land was owned by the City of Broomfield at that time. It was purchased later by the Department of Energy. Mr. Hites asked if the parents of the children that had been playing in the area that had set the fire had been notified that their children could have received an inhalation exposure to plutonium in the smoke. The Mayor's assistant promised to check on it and get back with him. When Mr. Hites called back for follow up, they refused to discuss the matter. Following the fire, the Colorado Department of Health (CDH) was asked to investigate the area for possible radiological contamination. The CDH subsequently issued a Special Report "Haystack Fire May 21, 1991 -- Dosimetry & Hazard (cancer risk) Assessment for Firemen Responding on Location". The soil at the haystack fire site, ash, boots & bunker trouser wipes for West Adams County and the Westminster Fire Department personnel responding to the fire were tested. The highest plutonium reading was 3.97 picoCuries per gram (pCi/g), which equates to 8.70 disintegrations per minute per gram (dpm/g). The Colorado State Standard for plutonium in soil (the 1st, and possibly only state with a Pu standard) is 2.0 dpm/g. Plutonium levels in remote areas of Colorado average 0.04 dpm/g. The CDH Special Report results indicate that the area of the haystack fire was in fact contaminated with approximately 217.5 times greater plutonium contamination than that of "background" plutonium readings from remote areas not surrounding the Rocky Flats Plant. Worldwide fallout "background radiation" is assumed to be that deposited from above-ground nuclear bomb testing in the 1950's and 1960's. There is no available information concerning follow up regarding the children playing in the area that set the fire. There is no posting warning of radiation or contamination hazard in this area. The only signs currently posted state "No Trespassing", and one "No Swimming" sign. REPRINT: SPRING 1993 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION NETWORK NEWS __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Re: "Plutonium won't stay in Livermore" (CA) Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Perchlorate in the High-Texas plains | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Re: "Plutonium won't stay in Livermore" (CA) Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Perchlorate in the High-Texas plains |