From: | Christine Ziebold <c_ziebold@yahoo.com> |
Date: | 8 Apr 2006 05:31:53 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Re: "Plutonium won't stay in Livermore" (CA) |
...so it will go to Oak Ridge? see below - maybe this had been posted on the listserv and I didnt see it.- http://www.joplinglobe.com/print.php?story_id=233581 March 20, 2006 Secrecy shrouds work Eagle-Picher plant, Mid-America take part in nuclear program By Wally Kennedy Globe Business Writer The stainless-steel boxes are manufactured in Joplin. They're shipped to Quapaw, Okla., where they are lined with a boron-based material. >From there, the boxes go to the Y-12 National Security Complex at Oak Ridge, Tenn. That's about all you can find out locally about the national security project that involves two local companies, the EaglePicher Technologies boron plant at Quapaw and Mid-America Precision Products in Joplin. The managers of those companies, Jim Hall at the boron plant, and Doug Wright at Mid-America, say they would like to talk about the work their companies are doing for the National Nuclear Security Administration, but a shield of secrecy has been placed over the project. That shield was penetrated earlier this month by Frank Munger, a writer for the Knoxville News-Sentinel in Knoxville, Tenn. Munger, who has written about U.S. Department of Energy projects at Oak Ridge for many years, noticed a reference to the project in federal budget documents. After weeks of probing, he uncovered information about the project that could be published. Munger, in a recent interview, said it is difficult and time consuming to get information about what is going on at Oak Ridge and that government workers have been fired for releasing details that at the time appeared to be unimportant, but later proved to be sensitive or classified information about the nuclear-weapons plant. Steven Wyatt, a public relations spokesman for the DOE, said secrecy actually is written into the deal with private companies. "The people in Joplin and Quapaw who know about this work cannot talk about it. That's part of the contract," he said. "Everything associated with nuclear weapons is very, very sensitive from manufacturing, to storage, to accountability. It's all tightly controlled.'' Wyatt confirmed that Mid-America in Joplin is constructing rackable storage boxes that are lined with a boron-based ceramic material by EaglePicher at Quapaw. "Our plan is to place highly-enriched uranium in the rackable boxes and place the materials in a facility that is now under construction at Oak Ridge. This highly-enriched uranium is used in nuclear weapons,'' he said. The government is spending millions on the boxes to house the nation's stockpile of bomb-grade uranium. According to Munger, about 900 of the boxes have been purchased. The proposed budget for 2007 includes money to buy another 500. Wyatt would not specify how many of the boxes will be needed at the storage complex, which is scheduled for completion early next year. The uranium storehouse will cost $350 million to construct. The special filler material in the boxes is EaglePicher's BoroBond4. According to information released by EaglePicher early last year, the company was awarded a $6.2 million subcontract by BWXT Y-12, LLC, the operating contractor at the Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, to cast BoroBond4 in the boxes. Munger said BoroBond4, which took EaglePicher more than four years to develop, is "a nuclear poison'' in that it absorbs neutrons to enhance the safety of storing nearly pure U-235 - uranium's fissionable isotope. Wyatt said the National Nuclear Security Administration has spent about $8 million acquiring the new storage boxes. Budget documents for 2007 indicate that $10 million is being proposed to purchase another 500 boxes and to accelerate some related security activities at Y-12. BoroBond4, made by Eagle-Picher in Joplin, reduces the storage space requirements for bomb-grade uranium. The material permits enriched uranium to be stored in a smaller space, reducing the size and cost of the uranium-storage site. ------------------- and maybe it will go into the 125 new Nuclear Weapons/ year? ----------------------- Bush Administration Unveils Plans to Produce 125 New Nuclear Weapons a Year: Seeks Return to Cold War Nuclear Weapons Capabilities David Culp, Friends Committee on National Legislation (Quakers) April 6, 2006 The Bush administration unveiled plans Wednesday to produce 125 new nuclear weapons a year. The plans include building a new nuclear bomb plant at an existing weapons site. The multi-billion dollar proposal was presented at a Capitol Hill hearing by the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), the semi-autonomous federal agency in charge of nuclear weapons. NNSA plans to consolidate its plutonium operations into one new bomb factory with the capacity to produce 125 nuclear weapons per year. Potential sites for the so-called Consolidated Plutonium Center include the Savannah River Site in South Carolina, Pantex Plant in Texas, Nevada Test Site, and Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. The agency also announced that it was canceling construction of the multi-billion dollar Modern Pit Facility at the Savannah River Site, but would instead include plutonium "pit" production in the larger new bomb plant. The new bomb factory would also house plutonium R&D activities now occurring at the Livermore National Laboratory in California and Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. The new facility, slated for completion in 2022, would also be the national storage site for plutonium. The Oak Ridge Y-12 plant in Tennessee would be designated as the national storage site for weapons uranium. Research activities at the two weapons labs not involving large quantities of weapons material would continue. The government's program for consolidating nuclear weapons materials is being driven primarily by security concerns since 9/11. NNSA deputy administrator Tom D'Agostino told a panel of the House Armed Services Committee yesterday that the plan "would restore us to a level of capability comparable to what we had during the Cold War." D'Agostino praised the new nuclear weapon called the "Reliable Replacement Warhead" (RRW) as the "enabler" for the revived nuclear weapons complex. "RRW, we believe, will provide enormous leverage for a more efficient and responsive infrastructure..." "For all the talk about eliminating weapons of mass destruction, the administration is proposing that the U.S. return to Cold War era levels of nuclear weapons production capability," said David Culp, senior lobbyist at the Friends Committee on National Legislation. "This is a dangerous step in the wrong direction and will spur a new nuclear arms race. The U.S. cannot increase nuclear weapons production and tell the rest of the world to not build these weapons." [The NNSA press release and testimony on the proposed plan is on their website at www.nnsa.doe.gov <http://www.nnsa.doe.gov/> .] ----------- Christine Ziebold MD PhD MPH Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant RAB community member __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Former Camp Adair (OR) Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Grass Fire Burns 1,300 Acres NW of Denver | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Former Camp Adair (OR) Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Grass Fire Burns 1,300 Acres NW of Denver |