From: | Lenny Siegel <lennysiegel@gmail.com> |
Date: | 14 Aug 2007 23:58:47 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site, Colorado |
Letters blast Piñon expansion By TOM ROEDER Colorado Springs Gazette August 13, 2007A lengthy government document available online this week has little to do with the expansion plan for Fort Carson's Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site. But it speaks volumes about how some people in southeast Colorado view the Army's aspirations to buy 418,000 acres east of Trinidad. The document describes increases in noise, traffic and other disturbances that will come as an additional 10,000 soldiers use the existing training area in years to come under a Pentagon plan to add troops to Fort Carson. It also says how the Army will work to preserve the environment there. But 500 pages of public comments added at the end of the environmental impact statement mostly express rage over Army plans to increase the size of the training area from 367 to 1,020 square miles. Those comments don't include more than 3,300 form letters the Army received on the expansion issue. ... For the entire article, see http://www.gazette.com/articles/army_26012___article.html/expansion_statement.html See also Pinon expansion foes turn fire on senatorsSalazar, Allard berated for stance on Army's use of eminent domain to enlarge training facility. By TAMMY ALHADEF THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN August 14, 2007KIM - Foes of the Army's plan to expand its Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site call recent proposals by Colorado's U.S. senators to restrict the Army's use of eminent domain for land acquisition "misleading and ineffective." Lon Robertson, president of the Pinon Canyon Expansion Opposition Coalition, said Monday attempts by Democrat Ken Salazar and Republican Wayne Allard to limit the use of condemnation but still allow the 414,000-acre expansion to proceed were unworkable. Such a course of action would guarantee that Southern Colorado ranches eventually would be seized by the military, Robertson said. He wants to know why the Colorado senators are supporting what he called "a destructive proposal." ... For the entire article, see http://www.chieftain.com/metro/1187098146/6 -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Rialto (CA) perchlorate injunction Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Suisun Bay (CA) mothball fleet | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Rialto (CA) perchlorate injunction Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Ft. Rucker (AL) encroachment study |