From: | Lenny Siegel <lennysiegel@gmail.com> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:39:23 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] ENCROACHMENT: Fort Drum (NY) buffer zone |
Army seeks buffer zone around Fort Drum ACUB PROGRAM: Landowners would eschew development By SARAH M. RIVETTE WATERTOWN DAILY TIMES (NY) JULY 17, 2008A new Army program has come to the north country and could mean good things for farmers and landowners who don't want to get priced out by developers. "Basically we allow them to participate in the real estate market, but keep their land," said Betty J. Jones, who works in the Plans, Analysis and Integration Office on post and is the liaison for the Army Compatible Use Buffer program. The program would allow landowners to keep their land, but would stop them from selling it for development purposes. This would, in effect, maintain the "buffer zone" around the post and allow residents and landowners to continue using their land. The program is a solution to encroachment issues that other military installations have faced, and according to Mrs. Jones, it is the perfect time for the program to start at Drum because there are now no large issues of encroachment. ... For the entire article, see http://www.watertowndailytimes.com/article/20080717/NEWS03/948563985/Army+seeks+buffer+zone+around+Fort+Drum -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/military-cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] REALIGNMENT: Middletown (CT) regional Army training base Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] REGULATION: Defense Department questions state enforcement | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] REALIGNMENT: Middletown (CT) regional Army training base Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] REGULATION: Defense Department questions state enforcement |