|From:||Lenny Siegel <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:38:29 -0700 (PDT)|
|Subject:||[CPEO-MEF] BIOTA: Ft. Irwin (CA) seeks to move desert tortoises|
Army seeks to move more than 1,100 desert tortoises Julie Cart Los Angeles Times Greenspace August 5, 2009As it prepares to expand training operations at Ft. Irwin in the Mojave Desert, the U.S. Army is again proposing to move more than 1,100 threatened California desert tortoises -- an unprecedented number of an endangered species that has not fared well during previous relocations.
The Army is seeking the approval of the federal Bureau of Land Management to move the tortoises from nearly 100,000 acres in portions of the National Training Center to lands managed by the BLM. The environmental assessment is under BLM review and the proposed action is open for a 15-day public comment period.
Moving desert tortoises is not always successful. The Army relocated more than 600 of the animals last year but suspended the $8.7-million program after the first phase when officials noted high mortality rates among the tortoises, chiefly because of coyotes.
.... For the entire article, see http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/greenspace/2009/08/desert-tortoise-endangered-species-army-training-.htmlFor the Bureau of Land Management news release,see also http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/newsroom/2009/july/CDD0960_tortoise_translocation_EA.html
-- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/military-cpeo.org
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] HEALTH: Guardsmen exposed to sodium dichromate in Iraq|
Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] PERCHLORATE: The debate over regulation
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] HEALTH: Guardsmen exposed to sodium dichromate in Iraq|
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] PERCHLORATE: The debate over regulation