From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Fri, 25 Sep 2015 01:25:15 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] "Review Criteria for Successful Treatment of Hydrolysate at the Blue Grass [KY] Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant" |
Review Criteria for Successful Treatment of Hydrolysate at the Blue Grass Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant National Academies Press 2015 The Blue Grass Chemical Agent Pilot Plant (BGCAPP) is being constructed under the direction of the Program Executive Officer for Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives (PEO ACWA). BGCAPP is scheduled to begin its operations to destroy chemical munitions in 2018. Following munitions access and hydrolysis of nerve agents and energetics, BGCAPP will use a first-of-a-kind (FOAK) technology known as supercritical water oxidation (SCWO) to treat the hydrolysate and a water recovery system (WRS) to recover water for reuse as quench water in the SCWO reactors. Except for scheduled maintenance, the SCWO and WRS systems are intended to operate continuously for over 3 years. In an attempt to address potential issues with the systems that will be used to treat hydrolysate, BGCAPP will conduct preoperational testing. This testing will take place concurrent with plant systemization and will address process and equipment problems that were identified during and after FOAK testing. These measures should help to address anticipated problems as BGCAPP begins the actual munitions destruction process. The SCWO and WRS systems should be able to be operated successfully. Yet there remain a number of factors that could cause the SCWO and WRS to underperform. For example, the agent and energetic hydrolysates to be generated at BGCAPP constitute a very complex matrix. As another example, the actual SCWO system that will be used at BGCAPP has never processed actual agent or energetic hydrolysates. Further, the SCWO and the WRS have never been operated together. These and other factors could lead to the SCWO and WRS underperforming and possibly delay the destruction of the chemical munitions stored at the Blue Grass Army Depot. These munitions have now been stored for over five decades. Many of them have leaked and, although the chemical munitions are stored in a protective manner, continued storage of these munitions represents an ongoing risk to the local community. These munitions must be destroyed safely and efficiently, and it is therefore important to ensure that problems with the SCWO and WRS do not delay this process. All the more so since there will be long lead times associated with implementing any alternatives to processing hydrolysates through the SCWO and WRS. The Army needs a backup plan for treating the BGCAPP hydrolysate and needs to be in a position to implement it expeditiously if necessary. … To download or order the document, go to http://www.nap.edu/catalog/21771/review-criteria-for-successful-treatment-of-hydrolysate-at-the-blue-grass-chemical-agent-destruction-pilot-plant? -- Lenny Siegel Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight a project of the Pacific Studies Center 278-A Hope Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650-961-8918 or 650-969-1545 Fax: 650-961-8918 LSiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@lists.cpeo.org http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/military-cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] PFCs: "Brunswick Landing [ME] water contamination remedies in dispute" Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] REUSE: Plattsburgh Air Force Base (NY) 22 years later | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] PFCs: "Brunswick Landing [ME] water contamination remedies in dispute" Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] REUSE: Plattsburgh Air Force Base (NY) 22 years later |