CPEO MILITARY CASE STUDIES
Forum on the Use of Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response
The people who live in the communities where teams look for and destroy unexploded ordnance—in some cases directly on project sites—are the ultimate customers of munitions response. At the November 27, 2012 Stakeholders’ Forum on the Use of Geophysical Classification for Munitions Response, ten geographically representative stakeholders from some of the nation’s best known former range sites met to learn about and discuss the use of this emerging technology. Participants were uniformly positive about the technology, but they raised important questions about the ways that the technology will be implemented.Download the 6-page, 1.2 MB PDF file.
The Limitations of
Wellhead Treatment: Bethpage and Massapequa, Long Island, New York
The Northrop-Grumman facility in Bethpage, Long Island, New York illustrates some of the challenges that may emerge when wellhead treatment is a primary component of a groundwater remedy. In 2010 the Massapequa Water District sought federal intervention in the state-regulated cleanup when data indicated that a groundwater plume was likely to impact its drinking-water supply aquifers within the next few years.
Download the 4-page, 872 KB PDF file with pictures.
Chemical Depot Prairie: Can a Success Story Be Saved?
The 7,000-acre Newport Chemical Depot, nestled in western Indiana’s Wabash Valley, is about to be returned to civilian use. The former home of the U.S. Army’s production program for VX nerve agent, it is slated for transfer to a Vermillion County-sponsored Local Reuse Authority sometime this year. Local residents and official are now debating how the former ammunition plant can best provide some of the prairie habitat that once characterized much of this portion of the country.Download the 5-page, 3.1 MB PDF file with pictures.
Adaptive Cleanup of
the “Regional Plume” in Mountain View, California
The “Regional Plume” of volatile- organic-compound (VOC) ground- water contamination in Mountain View, California ranks as one of the nation’s more serious remediation challenges. For two decades, community oversight in Mountain View has served as a national model. Now discussions among U.S. EPA, federal and private responsible parties, and the local community may serve as a model for conducting long-term cleanup where the application of conventional technologies is diminishing in effectiveness and where existing remedies have been found to be unprotective.Download the 15-page, 2 MB PDF file with pictures.
The Sun Shines on
the Department of Defense
A systematic program to install rooftop solar systems at Defense facilities throughout the United States is perhaps the quickest, most dramatic way for the U.S. government to increase renewable power generation and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The roofs are there. The technologies exist. The Department appears to have the will to move forward. All that is needed are financial decision-making mechanisms that internalize the benefits of alternative energy.Download the 8-page, 1.9 MB PDF file with pictures.
Response at Camp SLO, California
The 2,101-acre Formerly Used Defense Site at Camp Luis Obispo, California, contains a munitions impact range where unexploded ordnance has been found on or near the surface. Because the site is accessible by the public, California’s Department of Toxic Substances Control wants the Army Corps of Engineers to return to its original plan to conduct surface clearance as part of a Time Critical Removal Action.
Download the 3-page, 796 KB PDF file with pictures.
Clearing Up the
“All of Nothing” Legacy at the Jefferson Proving Ground, Indiana
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service operates the Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge (BONWR) on
50,000 acres at the former Jefferson Proving Ground in southern
Indiana. In many ways, the Refuge is like any other expanse of
preserved habitat, but access is limited because the property contains
millions of rounds of unexploded ordnance. The Refuge wants the Army to
clear land so it can build a visitor center and replace a bridge, but
the Army refuses to use BRAC (Base Realignment and Closure) funds to
conduct any form of area clearance. Congressman Baron Hill is seeking
funds to conduct munitions response and building the proposed visitors’
Community Advice at the
Lake Ontario Ordnance Works, New York
New York’s former Lake Ontario
Ordnance Works (LOOW) and the associated Niagara Falls Storage Site
(NFSS) are not the largest or most complex of the cleanup sites owned
by the Departments of Defense and Energy, but the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers’ (USACE) community relations program there has recently
become one of the most controversial. Despite the current stalemate
between the Corps and the local community, it appears that differences
could be solved relatively easily by looking at the Defense
Department’s RAB [Restoration Advisory Boards] Rule and the process
that led to its development.
CPEO Comments on Moffett
Field’s Hangar One Engineering Evaluation Cost Analysis
We appreciate the Navy’s
efforts to both inform our community and hear our concerns about the
proposed Removal Action for Moffett Field’s Site 29, Hangar One, but we
remain disappointed in both the quality of the July 2008 Engineering
Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) and the limitations of the Navy’s
proposed action. The Navy should plan to fully restore Hangar One after
removing toxic substances from the cladding (roof and siding) and short
of that, it should explain why it does not wish to and does not have
Community Perspectives on Underwater Munitions Response
by Lenny Siegel
Reviewing U.S. underwater
munitions sites, CPEO Executive Director Lenny Siegel found enormous
variety in scale, the type of the munitions, and the nature of the
waterways. Despite the diversity, he found that community members and
officials share a risk management perspective, where the need for
cleanup is primarily determined by the potential for exposure.
Avoiding a National Security “Train Wreck”
CPEO Executive Director
Lenny Siegel explores emerging conflicts between the Defense Department
and the renewable energy industry. Siegel focuses on land competition
in California’s Western Mojave Desert among energy development,
national security, habitat preservation, and off-road vehicle
recreation, as well as the intereference to radar caused by wind
turbines. Siegel suggests cooperative approaches to resolving such
conflicts, before it’s too late.
When Is Enough, Enough?
CPEO Executive Director
Lenny Siegel evaluated community perspectives on the cleanup of
(TCE) plumes at the closed Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) in
Minnesota (New Brighton and Arden Hills) and former Moffett Naval Air
Station in the San Francisco Bay Area (Mountain View and Sunnyvale).
Specifically, Siegel reviewed the decision to shut down treatment at
TCAAP’s Operable Unit 3 (OU3)—the South Plume emanating from the former
arsenal—and the debate over future treatment at Moffett Field’s Site
26, the Eastside aquifer.
Canyon Maneuver Site Expansion: A Cloud Hangs over Southern Colorado
The Army proposes to nearly
triple the size of the Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site in Southern
Colorado. Ranchers, supported by a diverse coalition, oppose the
expansion. They are fighting to hold on to their property and preserve
their way of life—multi-generational, sustainable cattle-raising. With
support from Congress, they have delayed the plan, but the threat of
future eminent domain depresses the region’s economy.
and VOC Response at Department of Defense Installations
CPEO Executive Director Lenny
Siegel visited communities hosting Defense Installations and discussed
Volatile Organic Compound response technologies with community members.
In the course of this project, he visited four bases with large
environmental restoration programs, known contamination with TCE and/or
PCE, and a history of significant community involvement and
controversy. He talked with members of Restoration Advisory Boards and
other community groups at the following five installations:
Communities and Munitions
The Center for Public
Environmental Oversight evaluated public stakeholders’ views of
existing and emerging munitions response technologies. In particular,
CPEO sought to find out how impacted communities view munitions
response strategies in which project teams selectively excavate
geophysical anomalies recorded during site surveys. To answer this
question, Lenny Siegel visited munitions response sites at Amaknak
(Dutch Harbor), Alaska; the former Lowry Bombing and Gunnery Range,
Colorado; Camp Edwards, Massachusetts; and the Former Mojave Gunnery
Range Complex, California. In addition, he drew upon earlier visits to
numerous other military ranges as well as correspondence with
stakeholders from other munitions response properties. He interviewed
landowners, members of Restoration Advisory Boards, and other public
is a Two-Way Street
Download 6-page, 1.7 MB PDF file with pictures.
Chemical Warfare Materiel
The Center for Public
Environmental Oversight conducted field work to evaluate community
attitudes toward the various technologies and approaches to Chemical
Warfare Materiel (CWM) response. CPEO Executive Director Lenny Siegel
visited five communities where Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) have
known CWM issues and interviewed stakeholders, including local, state,
and tribal officials. The five FUDS were the American University
Experimental Station, Spring Valley, Washington, DC; Amaknak Island,
Unalaska/Dutch Harbor, Aleutian Islands, Alaska; Former Lowry Bombing
and Gunnery Range (also known as Buckley Field), Aurora, Colorado;
Black Hills Ordnance Depot, Igloo, South Dakota; and Former Camp
Sibert, Steele, Alabama. The stakeholders who took part in this study
were remarkably frank, and they offered valuable, though varied
opinions about the technologies with which they were familiar.