From: | rst@rti.org |
Date: | 1 Mar 2001 18:07:37 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-BIF] "Brownfields widespread, confidential Ohio industrialpollution |
I need correct Lenny's definition of CERCLIS. It is not a list of contaminated sites, but rather is a list which includes sites where there is (or was) some suspicion of contamination. That suspicion was defined rather broadly at the onset of the Superfund program, and the misperception that inclusion on CERCLIS = contamination is arguably one of the reasons that Brownfields exist in the first place (hence the EPA definition as sites "with real or perceived contamination". EPA deleted lots of sites from that very long list after recognizing that many sites were included without sufficient (or any) evidence of contamination, but even with those remaining on CERCLIS, until a site is assessed or investigated to confirm the suspicions that led to its listing, it should only be regarded as possibly contaminated rather than contaminated. - Robert Truesdale Research Triangle Institute ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To read CPEO's archived Brownfields messages visit http://www.cpeo.org/lists/brownfields If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to cpeo-brownfields-subscribe@igc.topica.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ____________________________________________________________ T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01 | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Hearing on S. 350, Brownfields Revitalization and Environmenta Next by Date: RE: [CPEO-BIF] Digest for cpeo-brownfields@igc.topica.com, issue 185 | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Brownfields and the public Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-BIF] Digest for cpeo-brownfields@igc.topica.com, issue 185 |