From: | dgraham@baker-hostetler.com |
Date: | 26 Apr 2001 22:07:32 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] New Jersey Environmental Justice Opinion and Effect of U.S. Supreme |
At Tony Chenhansa's request, I am forwarding an e-mail prepared by Bill Funk of the Lewis & Clark Law School to the cpeo-brownfields subscribers. It should assist everyone in understanding the effect of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on the New Jersey opinion. David Graham -----Original Message----- From: Bill Funk [mailto:funk@LCLARK.EDU] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 7:04 PM To: ENVIRON-ABA@MAIL.ABANET.ORG Subject: Re: For those following developments in the area of environmentaljustice, today's decision of the Unite Alexander v. Sandoval not only eliminates any private action under Title VI regulations for disparate impact discrimination (and thereby erasing the recent NJ district court case), it also places in grave doubt the disparate impact discrimination regulations themselves. The Court assumed for purposes of argument that those regulations were valid, and went out of its way to make clear this was just an assumption for purposes of this litigation, but its analysis as to why the regulations could not support a private right of action suggests that they are simply not valid. The Court stated that Section 601, which prohibits only intentional discrimination, creates a private right of action on its own terms and for regulations which likewise prohibit intentional discrimination. The Court then said that Section 602, under which the disparate impact regulations were supposedly adopted, cannot authorize a private right of action for any activity not unlawful under Section 601. If, however, the disparate impact regulations adopted pursuant to Section 602 are not closely enough related to Section 601 to support a private right of action authorized by Section 601, it is doubtful whether they are closely enough related to Section 601 to be valid at all, because Section 602 only authorizes agencies to issue rules "to effectuate the provisions" of Section 601. Moreover, the Court's 14th Amendment Section 5 jurisprudence is likely to be transplanted into the terms of Section 602. That is, while Congress is not precluded from prohibiting actions that are not themselves violative of the 14th Amendment (i.e., not precluded from prohibiting actions having a disparate impact instead of merely those that are intentionally discriminatory), any such prophylactic congressional laws (or agency rules under Title VI) must be congruent and proportional to actual violations found to exist. Under this standard all of EPA's disparate impact regulations would fail. Bill Funk Lewis & Clark Law School *********************************************************** THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately. Thank you. *********************************************************** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To read CPEO's archived Brownfields messages visit http://www.cpeo.org/lists/brownfields If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to cpeo-brownfields-subscribe@igc.topica.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://igc.topica.com/u/?aVxieR.aVGyPL Or send an email To: cpeo-brownfields-unsubscribe@igc.topica.com This email was sent to: cpeo-brownfields@npweb.craigslist.org T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01 ==^================================================================ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] How does the Supreme Court Decision affect the Camden, NJ Title VI Next by Date: RE: [CPEO-BIF] How does the Supreme Court Decision affect the Camden, NJ Title | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] How does the Supreme Court Decision affect the Camden, NJ Title VI Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-BIF] How does the Supreme Court Decision affect the Camden, NJ Title |