From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 24 Jun 2005 18:15:03 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] Reps call for protective interim approach for TCE |
[Today a bipartisan group of 13 members of Congress sent a letter, initiated by Rep. Sue Kelly (R-NY) to U.S. EPA calling for a "protective interim approach" to TCE exposure. I have typed in the signatures and added identifying information below. ? LS] June 24, 2005 The Honorable Stephen L. Johnson Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building (1101A) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Dear Administrator Johnson: Millions of Americans are exposed to trichloroethylene (TCE) every day in their water and air. Many scientists believe TCE to be carcinogenic, immunotoxic, and neurotoxic. As you know, EPA drafted a Human Health Risk Assessment in 2001 that determined TCE is 5 to 65 times more toxic than previously believed. The Assessment received a positive review from EPA's Science Advisory Board, which commended EPA for its "groundbreaking" work. Based upon the Assessment, EPA regions developed new, more protective provisional screening levels, and some even began using these provisional standards in the field. However, other federal agencies considered the new levels overly conservative, and EPA agreed to send the scientific issues raised by the Assessment to the National Academy of Sciences' National Research Council for re-review. Gradually, EPA's regions de-emphasized the more protective screening levels. When Members of Congress wrote letters to EPA asking that the protective standards be used, Henry L. Longest, II, Acting Assistant Administrator for EPA's Office of Research and Development, responded, "EPA is current evaluating a number of interim approaches for screening levels while awaiting a final TCE risk assessment." Acting Assistant Administrator for the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Thomas Dunne, wrote, "For vapor intrusion issues ... EPA has not developed national guidance." It is expected that it will be years before EPA finalizes its TCE risk assessment, and Americans are constantly being exposed to this and similar toxic substances. We therefore strongly urge EPA to adopt a protective "interim approach." EPA should use provisional screening levels based upon the 2001 Human Health Risk Assessment until a new risk assessment is completed. For example, based upon work done by several EPA regions, the screening level for TCE in air would be about .02 micrograms per cubic meter. EPA personnel developing or overseeing the development of remediation and mitigation strategies should consider those levels. Most immediately, vapor exposure investigations should use sampling technologies designed to detect TCE down to those provisional levels. We appreciate your attention in this matter, and we look forward to hearing your response. Sincerely, Susan Kelly (R-NY) Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) Raul M. Grijalva (D-AZ) Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) Major R. Owens (D-NY) Elijah E. Cummings (D-MD) Anna G. Eshoo (D-CA) Katherine Harris (R-FL) Dennis J. Kucinich (D-Ohio) Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY) Howard L. Berman (D-CA) -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Vapor intrusion at new Bronx school Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Vapor intrusion at new Bronx school | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Vapor intrusion at new Bronx school Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Hillcrest (NY) TCE exposure |