From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 18 May 2005 22:55:10 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-IRF] Sierra Army Depot |
I've heard back from the Army BRAC office. The detailed recommendations are the "whole truth," while the summaries and indexes may have errors. In this case, the Sierra Army Depot is indeed proposed for downsizing. Lenny Lenny Siegel wrote: > > The Defense Department's detailed description of its BRAC proposal > recommends the relocation of munitions storage from California's Sierra > Army Depot, but there is no mention of Sierra in the state-by-state > summary or the cross-reference index. > > Does anyone know which portion of the document is correct? > > See page 6 of Section 6 - Industrial, which may be downloaded from > http://www.defenselink.mil/brac/vol_I_parts_1_and_2.html. > > -- > > Lenny Siegel > Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight > c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 > Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 > Fax: 650/961-8918 > <lsiegel@cpeo.org> > http://www.cpeo.org > _______________________________________________ > Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list > Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org > http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] CORRECTED - BRAC '05 cleanup costs Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Oceana Naval Air Station (VA) retention debated | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Sierra Army Depot Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Obstacles to Reuse |