From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 24 Jun 2005 22:21:58 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Ft. Monroe (VA) |
Red tape could swallow Fort Monroe Private development at the base would face a slew of bureaucracy and uncertainty. TERRY SCANLON Newport News Daily Press (VA) June 23 2005 DENVER -- Converting Fort Monroe into a private development could prove to be a bureaucratic nightmare. If the base closes, potential legal hurdles would await the city of Hampton as it navigates state and federal regulations on transferring the property, cleaning the land, and building within the rules of historic and environmental regulations. "It's probably one of the most complex issues you'll ever deal with as a local government," said Keith Cannady, a chief planner with Hampton who attended a conference in Denver recently about converting military bases to private development. The conference was dominated by private consulting firms that specialize in various aspects of that, including planning, engineering, environmental cleanup and insurance on the cost of the cleanup. ... For the entire article, see http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-33564sy0jun23,0,7835110.story?coll=dp-headlines-topnews -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Fairfax County transportation costs Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Connecticut AG wants more Groton surveys | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Fairfax County transportation costs Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Connecticut AG wants more Groton surveys |