2005 CPEO Installation Reuse Forum Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: 25 Jul 2005 16:21:15 -0000
Reply: cpeo-irf
Subject: [CPEO-IRF] Oceana (VA) - "quick retreat" vs. "attrition"
 
The editorial excerpted and linked below is a welcome variance from the knee-jerk reactions that usually accompany base closure proposals. In most cases, host communities are better off with closures or realignments that make property available for civilian reuse, rather than retention decisions that convert bustling bases into military ghost towns.

The opportunity cost of mothballing bases are obvious. However, the underutilization option has another downside: the slow deterioration of facilities and infrastructure. This is what happened at San Francisco's Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, which was formally closed more than 15 years after it had lost most of its missions. By the time closure occurred, many buildings were unusable. Not only did normal property maintenance stop, but in some cases wiring and piping had been removed.

It's relatively easy to maintain and secure a base with hundreds or thousands of active-duty military personnel, or even with a comparable level of civilian employment. But once the major missions are gone, it's difficult to continue even routine activities. That's a lose-lose proposition for both the military and the community that will eventual gain control of the property.

Lenny Siegel

***


On Oceana, time to face reality


Editorial
The Virginian-Pilot
July 25, 2005

If Oceana Naval Air Station’s mission can’t be saved, if the next generation of thunderous fighters must indeed take off from runways someplace else, Virginia Beach would be arguably better off with a quick military retreat instead of a prolonged campaign of attrition.

According to a letter and to testimony before the Base Realignment and Closure Commission, the Pentagon sees decades of commercial and residential encroachment as eventually making the base’s mission impossible in the Beach.

Though it could survive this BRAC go-round, this may well be Oceana’s last reprieve. The Navy hopes to eventually replace the 6,000-acre master jet base with a new, bigger facility elsewhere, one on a plot so large that surrounding development will never be an issue.

...

For the entire editorial, see
http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=89652&ran=143430


-- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 http://www.cpeo.org

_______________________________________________
Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list
Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Virginia governor proposes aid
Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Guard generals urge separate process
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Virginia governor proposes aid
Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Guard generals urge separate process

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index