2006 CPEO Installation Reuse Forum Archive

From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org>
Date: 4 Aug 2006 08:14:16 -0000
Reply: cpeo-irf
Subject: [CPEO-IRF] Ft. Belvoir preferred plan
 
BRAC Preferred Plan Ignores Community Input.
Army Museum isolated from other area tourist attractions.

By Chuck Hagee
Mount Vernon Gazette (VA)
August 3, 2006


So much for community input. Nearly every aspect of what community leaders had envisioned for Mount Vernon and Lee districts as a result of Fort Belvoir's planned growth due to the Base Realignment and Closure Report, including the long-sought Army Museum, is not part of the Army's "Preferred Site Plan."


Of the anticipated 22,000 additional personnel, military and civilian, coming from other locations, only 4,000 are now planned to end up on the main post. The rest, approximately 18,000, will be located at the Engineer Proving Grounds near Springfield, according to the "preferred" plan.

During a media roundtable at Fort Belvoir headquarters building last Friday, Installation Commander Col. Brian Lauritzen emphasized that the operative word in the just released Department of the Army recommendation report was "preferred."

...

For the entire article, see
http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/article.asp?article=69636&paper=69&cat=104

--
Lenny Siegel
Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
http://www.cpeo.org
_______________________________________________
Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list
Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org
http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum

  Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Camp Bonneville (WA) cemetery proposal
Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Kansas Army Ammunition Plant
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Camp Bonneville (WA) cemetery proposal
Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Cecil Field (FL) deals

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index