From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 4 Aug 2006 08:14:16 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Ft. Belvoir preferred plan |
BRAC Preferred Plan Ignores Community Input. Army Museum isolated from other area tourist attractions. By Chuck Hagee Mount Vernon Gazette (VA) August 3, 2006 So much for community input. Nearly every aspect of what community leaders had envisioned for Mount Vernon and Lee districts as a result of Fort Belvoir's planned growth due to the Base Realignment and Closure Report, including the long-sought Army Museum, is not part of the Army's "Preferred Site Plan." Of the anticipated 22,000 additional personnel, military and civilian, coming from other locations, only 4,000 are now planned to end up on the main post. The rest, approximately 18,000, will be located at the Engineer Proving Grounds near Springfield, according to the "preferred" plan. During a media roundtable at Fort Belvoir headquarters building last Friday, Installation Commander Col. Brian Lauritzen emphasized that the operative word in the just released Department of the Army recommendation report was "preferred." ... For the entire article, see http://www.connectionnewspapers.com/article.asp?article=69636&paper=69&cat=104 -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Camp Bonneville (WA) cemetery proposal Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Kansas Army Ammunition Plant | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Camp Bonneville (WA) cemetery proposal Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Cecil Field (FL) deals |