From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 12 Jan 2006 19:07:03 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Watertown (MA) GSA property |
Watertown Citizens for Environmental Safety PRESS RELEASE 1/9/06 WCES WANTS CHILDREN AND THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTED Watertown Citizens for Environmental Safety (WCES) urges citizens to attend the next meeting of the Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) meeting, where the fate of the "GSA Property" on Greenough Boulevard will be discussed. The meeting will take place on January 17 in the Lower Hearing Room of Town Hall. It will begin at 7 with a review of Superfund cleanup activities in the Charles River and then continue with a presentation on the status of the environmental cleanup at the GSA site, an area that was once used as a dumping ground for the Manhattan Project. WCES has been following the cleanup of the Watertown Arsenal since 1987 and participates actively in the RAB, a Pentagon-initiated citizens' advisory group that works with Army and regulatory officials to give community input into the environmental restoration of Watertown's former military sites. We are pleased that, after a long process, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has nearly completed its cleanup of the GSA site in preparation for turning the property over to the state Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). Both WCES and the RAB, however, have unresolved concerns about the conditions of the transfer. The Corps of Engineers' studies concluded that this property is sufficiently free of hazardous waste to make it acceptable for use as playing fields, but not for areas where young children will play. WCES members think this is making too fine a distinction; if children play soccer, their younger siblings will come to watch the games. The RAB asked the Corps to have another look at their Risk Assessment in light of this apparent contradiction. The Corps did so and then decided that since their data showed it was not safe for younger children to play there, they would prohibit use of the site for playing fields as well. The property could be used for wetland and passive recreation such as walking trails. But we understand that DCR is refusing to accept the GSA property with a limitation on playing fields and they are not planning to require further cleanup to make the area safe for young children, either. Instead, they are asking the Corps to abide by its original risk assessment and claiming that the original distinction between younger and slightly older children is legal under MA laws. It seems that DCR would prefer to have the property declared safe rather than actually made safe by demanding further cleanup or accepting the more stringent use limitation. The USACE is committed to transferring this site by September 2006 under any terms the state will accept. The DCR has been vigorously pursuing public/private partnerships throughout the Commonwealth. A nearby private school is interested in having the use of the GSA property for playing fields. Is the state so willing to pursue private funding that it will disregard the wishes of the host community or the safety of young children? Please join WCES members at the RAB meeting on January 17 and let state officials know that Watertown demands an environment that is clean and safe for all our citizens and public agencies that put the public first. WCES is Watertown's voice for peace, the environment and social justice. For more information about WCES, go to www.watertowncitizens.org. For more information about the GSA site and the January 17 RAB meeting, write to mail@watertowncitizens.org, or call 617-926-8560. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Installation_Reuse_Forum mailing list Installation_Reuse_Forum@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/installation_reuse_forum | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Relocation a hard sell Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Maine's economy in the wake of Brunswick closure | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Relocation a hard sell Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Maine's economy in the wake of Brunswick closure |