From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 16 Nov 2006 16:31:57 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-irf |
Subject: | [CPEO-IRF] Concord (CA) - lawmakers respond |
Lawmakers oppose Navy plan for base Tauscher, Miller and Feinstein demand that Concord be involved in changes at naval weapons station By Tanya Rose CONTRA COSTA TIMES (CA) November 16, 2006 Federal lawmakers vowed Wednesday to fight the U.S. Navy's decision to consider selling the Concord Naval Weapons Station to a private developer, saying it would unfairly -- and perhaps illegally -- yank planning power away from the city of Concord. Rep. Ellen Tauscher, D-Alamo, said she still is trying to assess how serious the Navy is about selling the 5,170-acre base to construction and environmental cleanup firm the Shaw Group Inc. in exchange for military construction. If need be, she said, she would support legislation intended to stop the Navy in its tracks. "This kind of conveyance has never been done by the Navy in this context, and obviously we don't want the public scratched out of the planning process," she said Wednesday. Tauscher, Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., are trying to determine whether the legal authority cited by the Navy is being used properly. But those familiar with the process by which bases are closed and later turned over for public use say this type of conveyance -- and the legal authority used -- may be the wave of the future, as the military finds itself needing to unload its excess military bases quickly. ... For the entire article, see http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/local/states/california/16025992.htm Also, see the accompanying editorial at http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/16025948.htm --
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Concord (CA) "bombshell" Next by Date: [CPEO-IRF] Pascagoula Naval Station (MS) closure | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Concord (CA) "bombshell" Next by Thread: [CPEO-IRF] Pascagoula Naval Station (MS) closure |