From: | Peter Strauss <pstrauss@igc.org> |
Date: | Fri, 19 May 1995 22:22:38 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Intrinsic Remediation |
Re: intrinsic remediation AFCEE has been pushing this for some time. The theory goes that in due time all these chemicals break down, so why should we be pouring so much money into unnecessary cleanup. If we are talking only about fuel or petroleum compounds, that are not covered under CERCLA, AFCEE stands a greater chance of succeeding with this tactic. However, in general intinsic remediation cannot really be called a cleanup technique. Yes, it occurs and that should be be taken into consideration when selecting a cleanup strategy. As Marylia responded, its also very site and chemical specific. If you think they are going to go ahead with this strategy, I would recommend that the community insist upon a very strict monitoring to verify that it is working as expected. This also requires that the expected breakdown rate be understood by all concerned. On top of that, I recommend that a contingency plan be prepared which establishes strict criteria for implementing a pre-selected alternative strategy, if "intrinsic remediation" does not meet expectations. peter strauss | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Pressure/budgets Next by Date: "Medicine and Global Survival" | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Intrinsic Remediation Next by Thread: Re: Intrinsic Remediation |