|Date:||09 Jun 1995 17:54:35|
|Subject:||Returned mail: User unknown (fwd)|
Posting from Don Zweifel <firstname.lastname@example.org> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 1995 17:39:00 -0700 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@chapman.edu> To: email@example.com Subject: Returned mail: User unknown ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 550 firstname.lastname@example.org... User unknown ----- Unsent message follows ----- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 1995 17:39:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Zweifel <zweifel> To: careerproigc.org Subject: Our RAB and its responsibilities Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.91.950609164538.23243Aemail@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII To: David Keith et al, May we jump in here to try our hand at attempting to answer your questions? To begin with, let's say that I'm sure there was no conspiracy to deliberately delete our affiliations whether they were RAB or whatever. You were perfectly able to open up your name tag and add an affiliation, which would have taken all of one minute. It is a bit of a stretch to accuse Lenny of "astute deviousness and dirty tricks." In regards to your reference to the spectre of politics vis a vis with RABs, perhaps it's now time to look at the 'big picture' for a change. Let us presume for a moment that a RAB approves a certain plan of action in regards to remediation, don't you think that might have a potential impact or bearing on the surrounding community? Well my friend, it most likely does mitigate or augment the community's master plan. And if this isn't potentially political then we don't know have the foggiest idea of what we're talking about. RAB members will hopefully come to the conclusion that practically every decision they decide upon will ultimately impact reuse of their former DoD or DoE site. Is the contamination at the site an imminent or potentially imminent danger to human health? This is a critical question and the RABs must of necessity address this issue squarely. If one believes this doesn't have political ramifications then we're all dreaming. Don Zweifel
Prev by Date: Re: CONGRESSIONAL LETTER SUPPORTS DERA|
Next by Date: Brevity and paragraghical subdivisions in message traffic.
Prev by Thread: DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT UPDATE|
Next by Thread: Brevity and paragraghical subdivisions in message traffic.