From: | Aimee Houghton <aimeeh@igc.org> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Apr 1996 18:07:57 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | FEDERAL FACILITIES COMPLIANCE ACT (FFCA) |
From: Aimee Houghton <aimeeh@igc.org> Subject: FEDERAL FACILITIES COMPLIANCE ACT (FFCA) *********** WARNING: THIS IS A LONG FILE *********** Questions For The Record Senate Armed Services Committee, Readiness Subcommittee Environmental Security Programs April 5, 1996 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA) Senator McCain: The Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA) of 1992 amended the Hazardous and Solid Waste Disposal Act by applying certain requirements and sanctions to Federal facilities. FFCA expressly waived federal sovereign immunity for civil, criminal, and administrative fines and penalties. (a) What amount of FFCA fines and penalties have been assessed against each military department in FY 1995 and for FY 1996? Identify by Military Department, nature of the violation, and fiscal year. (b) What fines and penalties were paid in FY 1995 and in FY 1996? Identify the amount of fines and penalties paid, and those satisfied with supplemental environmental projects (SEPs). (c) To what extent have the regulators used the RCRA/CERCLA overlap to facilitate the assessment of FFCA fines and penalties for failure to meet schedules and milestones at CERCLA sites. Ms Goodman: (a) The follwing is a summary of FFCA Fines and Penalties assessed: MARINE AIR ARMY NAVY CORPS FORCE DLA FY 93 $3,995,041 $785,474 $84,900 $1,244,398 $ 2,600 FY 94 $6,298,432 $ 40,800 $41,724 $ 251,536 $81,345 FY 95 $ 639,216 $276,330 $ 0 $ 81,000 $ 4,000 $10,932,689 $1,102,604 $126,624 $1,576,934 $87,945 DoD Total Assessed- $13,826,796 (FY 93- FY 95) Note: This table reflects data available as of March 29, 1996, but changes can occur through negotiations. FY 1996 data is not available at this time. Typical violations identified by EPA and the States include alleged violations of technical regulatory requirements. The four most common allegations made are: (1) improper labeling; (2) accumlating hazardous waste in excess of 90 days; (3) failure to make a waste determination; and , (4) lack of training and failure to document training. (b) The following is a summary of FFCA Fines and Penalies paid (without SEPs): MARINE AIR ARMY NAVY CORPS FORCE DLA FY 93* $ 27,334 $74,309 $ 0 $102,081 $ 0 FY 94 $ 249,849 $437,540 $84,400 $ 93,376 $19,000 FY 95 $1,111,501 $409,757 $ 0 $ 88,634 $ 0 $1,388,684 $921,606 $84,400 $284,091 $19,000 DoD Total Paid- $2,697,781 (FY 93*- FY 95) Note: * reflects Second Half FY 93 data only. Penalties may be resolved by payment of monetary fines or by negotiating Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEP) in lieu of payment of monetary fines. SEPs are environmentally beneficial projects that a violator agrees to undertake in settlement of an enforcement action, but which the violator is not otherwise legally required to perform. EPA and DoD support this negotiation because SEPs protect public health and provide direct environmental benefits. The additional fines and penalties satisfied through SEPs is summarized below: MARINE AIR ARMY NAVY CORPS FORCE DLA FY 95 $1,568,231 $0 $0 $31,604 $0 DoD SEP Total- $1,599,835 (FY95) Army SEP examples include elimination of spent solvent with non-hazardous solvent, relocation of satellite accumulation areas, Environmental Compliance Officer Training Program, and implementaion of model hazardous substance management system. Air Force SEP's accomplished include EOD awareness training to the local community and seven RCRA programs at Mt. Home AFB, Idaho. (c) The Air Force has not experienced fines and penalties for failure to meet schedules at CERCLA sites based on regulator use of the RCRA/CERCLA overlap. Army and Navy data will be provided at a later date. | |
Prev by Date: DSMOA PROGRAM Next by Date: Re: DSMOA PROGRAM | |
Prev by Thread: Re: DSMOA PROGRAM Next by Thread: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA FFERDC BRIEFING |