From: | Don Zweifel <zweifel@chapman.edu> |
Date: | 13 Jul 1997 11:31:50 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Response to DoD's Environmental Record |
Kuwait had 1330 wells all of which were actively pumping more than two million barrels of oil daily before the war began. Shortly after the Iraqi invasion on 2 August 1990 their forces began rigging explosives to most of these wellheads located in the vast Burqan and Al Wafrah oilfields. On the 21st of January 1991 Saadam became the greatest environmental polluter in history when those charges were detonated. Over three percent of Kuwait's oil reserves were lost or nearly three billion barrels of crude oil, roughly half of which either burned up or subsequently poured into the Persian Gulf. Over 11 million barrels of oil gushed into the Gulf daily until most of the wells were finally capped in November of that year. Atmospheric contamination from this debacle spread all the way to the Himalayas where black snow was reported. Acrid smoke and acid rain extended to an area twice the size of Alaska. Tens of thousands of sea birds, countless numbers of fish and other aquatic flora and fauna were decimated. Ecologists stated that it will take many generations for the Gulf and land mass encompassing Kuwait to recover. Saadam now has the singular distinction of probably being the first to destroy a significant proportion of a precious natural resource so ruthlessly and expeditiously. Saadam also launched a scorched earth campaign against Kuwait's tank farms, sole refinery and export terminals which effectively destroyed most of this tiny nation's oil-production capacity. How can one condemn the Department of Defense and/or our government for the sins and depredations of an aggressor nation? To be sure there was plenty of jetsam and flotsam left over from this war in the form of unexploded ordnance but shouldn't the initiator of this conflict pick up the tab for clean-up via war reparations? Does one surmise that the allied nations that were there to come to that nation's defense bear the brunt of these costs? In summation may we ask that our goal might be to glean information from various diverse sources to enable us to come up with a relatively unbiased point-of-view? At least a POV based on fact? Don Zweifel P.S.: The financial cost of the war including environmental depredation and clean-up to Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and hopefully Iraq amounts to $620 billion. Nearly 90 percent of the military campaign was underwritten by Japan, Germany and the Arab League nation-states. The US was reimbursed for most of it's military expenditures. We collected $54 billion via Tin Cup I and Tincup II fund-raising expeditions. Sources: "The Gulf War Reader," by Micah Sifry & Christopher Cerf and "Crusade, the Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War," by Rick Atkinson | |
Prev by Date: Re: Sole US-Philippine responsibility for contamination Next by Date: Titanium Tetrachloride | |
Prev by Thread: SENATE AGAINST CLOSURES Next by Thread: Titanium Tetrachloride |