From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@igc.org> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Dec 1997 11:11:28 -0700 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | CAPE COD BOG WATER COMPENSATION |
CAPE COD BOG WATER COMPENSATION In November, members of the Massachusetts Congressional delegation successfully inserted language into an Appropriations bill allowing the Air Force to compensate cranberry growers for crop losses due to pollution from the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR). Last year, cranberry bogs in Falmouth and Mashpee, on Cape Cod, were contaminated with ethylene dibromide (EDB), a toxic jet fuel additive that has been flowing through groundwater from the former Otis Air Force Base, which makes up a major portion of MMR. As a result, growers could not market the berries from those bogs. The Air Force, which has one of its largest cleanup projects at Otis, expressed its willingness to compensate the growers, but it said had no legal authority. So Massachusetts Senators Edward Kennedy and John Kerry and Representatives William Delahunt and Barney Frank (all Democrats) worked into the Commerce, Justice, State and Judiciary Appropriations Act language authorizing the payment of $800,000. It's unusual, but legal, to include language in an Appropriation Act relating to funds contained in another Appropriations bill. (I assume it was done this way because the Defense bill had already been signed.) The language (section 634) reads: "During fiscal year 1998, from funds available to the Department of Defense, up to $800,000 is available to the Department of Defense to compensate persons who have suffered documented commercial loss of cranberry crops in 1997 in the Mashpee or Falmouth bogs, located on the Quashnet and Coonamessett Rivers, respectively, as a result of the presence of ethylene dibromide (EDB) in or on cranberries from either of the plumes of EDB-contaminated groundwater known as 'FS-28' and 'FS-1' adjacent to the Massachusetts Military Reservation, Cape Cod, Massachusetts ." This brief piece of law may set a political precedent for future compensation, at least at MMR. More important, it conceptually recognizes a strictly economic cost of pollution. The payment is not for cleanup. It is not compensation for human health effects or natural resource damage. Rather, the Air Force is paying cranberry growers simply because its past activity is costing those growers money. At a time when responsible parties and regulators alike are increasingly taking the view that contamination is not a problem unless one can show health or ecological risk, the Cape Cod legislation appears to be a creative effort to internalize real costs that don't fit into those categories. Lenny Siegel Director, SFSU CAREER/PRO (and Pacific Studies Center) c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@igc.org | |
Prev by Date: Re: The Atsugi Lawsuit Article Next by Date: IMPACT TUNNELS | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Response to lawsuit re Atsugi NAS Next by Thread: IMPACT TUNNELS |