From: | Richard Hugus <rhugus@cape.com> |
Date: | 22 Apr 1998 11:34:32 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | No Open Detonation At Camp Edwards (fwd) |
EPA: No open-air detonation Agency suggests blast chamber for 1,100 corroded mortar shells By DOUG FRASER and GWENN FRISS STAFF WRITERS BOSTON - The 1,100 corroded mortar shells found on Camp Edwards since December cannot be exploded in open air, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said yesterday. The EPA wants the National Guard Bureau to detonate the old munitions in a portable blast chamber, designed to absorb impact while keeping toxic chemicals out of the air, soil and water. Dating back to the 1960s, the shells contain RDX and TNT, chemicals that pollute drinking water in concentrations as low as two parts per billion. Test wells near the site of past detonations show those chemicals ranging from three to, in one case, 190 ppb. "That's 200 times the EPA standard," said Elizabeth Higgins, director of environmental review for the EPA's regional office in Boston. Last month, the National Guard announced a plan to move the shells farther into the impact area on the base - and away from the Forestdale Elementary School in Sandwich - and blow them up, something they said is done on bases all over the country. The EPA said yesterday it won't be done at the Massachusetts Military Reservation. "We know there's a technology out there that's proven. It's up to the Guard to go and get it," Higgins said. The technology she refers to is a portable detonation chamber manufactured by Donovan Demolition of Illinois. The 34-year-old company said it could build the chamber and deliver it to the Upper Cape in about six months. It would take less than a week to blow up the mortars, company officials said, and could be done for about $1.4 million. The blast chamber would catch shrapnel from the shells and deaden the sound, and an air pollution control unit would treat the fumes before they were released into the air. Higgins said the fact the device has been used for 10 years at a General Dynamics facility in Tennessee is proof it works. This would be its first application on a military base. The EPA cannot order the Guard to use Donovan's device but it can prohibit them from blowing up the shells in the open air. An EPA order issued last April put in place a cease-fire on all live artillery training. EPA officials said they would grant that exception only if no other solution could be found. EPA regional administrator John DeVillars yesterday faxed a letter denying the variance to Maj. Gen. Russell Davis, the National Guard Bureau's vice chief, and to Maj. Gen. Raymond Vezina, top officer in the Massachusetts Army National Guard. He also faxed a letter asking the Army's acting secretary, Michael Walker, to reallocate $1.5 million from the existing budget and use special contracting procedures to get a portabl detonation chamber in place in six months. "Rapid action is necessary to provide a practical, immediate solution to a problem that is of increasing concern to EPA and the nearby citizens," he wrote. National Guard spokesman John Reinders said last night of the letters, "I don't this anyone here has seen it yet so we can't comment on what it says. "One thing I would mention is we're in full agreement with Mr. DeVillars that we really need to work together to resolve both the environmental and public safety issues." Local activists cheered the fact there would be no open detonation, but had doubts their welfare was ever high on the list of priorities for the military. "The Pentagon's vested interest is to get rid of this in the cheapest way possible," said James Kinney, a member of the Impact Area Search Review Team, a citizens panel created to give input into the cleanup. He said unexploded ordnance is a major problem nationwide, and this ruling could set a precedent for other cleanups on military installations. "This has been a long hard battle," said Paul Zanis, another member of the impact review team. " This past year with the National Guard has been very frustrating. They have not given us any information we didn't force out of them. If we have to force them to do the right thing every step of the way we will be there." Zanis grew up riding motorcycles on the post and watching artillery practice. He is widely considered an authority on where the military buried munitions on the base. He located the ammunition dump where the 1,100 mortar shells were found and is sure he could find more abandoned dumps, but said the National Guard won't let him. Impact review team member Joel Feigenbaum said the National Guard is taking an "out of sight, out of mind" attitude. "We'd like to see a full inventory of what's out there, and while this device is on the Cape, we'd like to see them dispose of everything that's hazardous," he said. Reinders said the Guard will have a response to the EPA decision today. Because the Guard is seeking a variance - or exception - to an existing cease-fire order, Higgins said, there is no appeal open to them. She said Guard officials had agreed in recent discussions that the portable chamber would work but still have doubts it can be readied in six months for $1.5 million. Higgins said the EPA hopes a chamber manufactured for Camp Edwards will eventually effect a national change in military munitions disposal. "We are looking for a mobile detonation chamber that can be used not only at MMR but at the literally millions of acres around the country where this problem exists." John G. Rodman, Massachusetts assistant secretary of environmental affairs, said last night the state has been planning to go along with whatever decision the EPA reached so long as the mortar shells were not moved more than once and monitoring was in place to ensure no air, water or soil pollution. "I haven't seen the EPA decision yet," Rodman said in a telephone interview from his home, "but it certainly sounds like it falls within the parameters of what the DEP (state Department of Environmental Protection) wanted to see." _______________________________________ Copyright (c) 1998 Cape Cod Times. All rights reserved. | |
Prev by Date: Four sort of demil questions... Next by Date: ABA 27th National Annual Conference on the Environment | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Four sort of demil questions... Next by Thread: ABA 27th National Annual Conference on the Environment |