From: | "Rosen, Jeanne A [AMSTA-AR-PSE]" <jrosen@pica.army.mil> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Aug 1999 17:53:41 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: Off-Base Sampling |
Folks, Sampling off post is a very interesting question and we were faced with a situation here in New Jersey. I have a question though if anyone can answer it. In New Jersey (I don't know if this is a federal law or state law) if negative results are found, the owner of the property is bound by law to inform any prospective buyer of this information. The problem then becomes this knowledge is dangerous and you have to accept the consequences if it is negative - - not being able to sell your house. It is also a mistake to think a federal facility or probably any company will assume the cost of cleanup. The owner will have to prove the contamination came from who they believe the responsible party is - - the cost of lawyers and cost of technical experts to prove your case can far exceed the value of the entire house and could leave you with a huge debt rather than for some their life's savings (their home). How is this situation handled else where? Jeanne Rosen | |
Prev by Date: Military Says: No Explosives in Bomb Accident Next by Date: Kansas: Graves touts effort to clean state's water | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Off-Base Sampling Next by Thread: RE: Off-Base Sampling |