From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 24 Aug 2001 00:38:46 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Budget Analysis |
I've done a quick numerical comparison of some of the items in this year's (fiscal year 02) proposed Defense Environment budget, shown today in an earlier message, against numbers from the previous two years. Despite increases in the total Defense budget, the overall environmental security budget is proposed to fall by 11.6 percent compared to FY01. Compared to FY00 the drop is only about 5%. The Navy Environmental Restoration budget dropped by nearly 14% compared to FY01 and over 11% compared to FY00. The Formerly Used Defense Sites proposal dropped by over 19% compared to FY01 and nearly 24% compared to FY00. The Army BRAC budget dropped by nearly 45% compared to FY01 and nearly over 13% compared to FY00. The Navy BRAC budget dropped by nearly 65% compared to FY01 but only 3% compared to FY00. The Air Force, which had its BRAC budget cut mid-year last year, received a 68% increase compared to FY01, 60% compared to FY00. All three armed services' already small environmental technology budgets have been cut significantly. The Army took a 68% hit this year and the Navy took a 32% cut. The Air Force programs identified as environmental technology dwindled from little to nothing. Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Boxer Opposes Closure Proposal Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Boxer Opposes Closure Proposal | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] New Defense Environmental Budget Figures Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Budget Analysis |