From: | StellaVB@aol.com |
Date: | 22 Jan 2002 18:55:53 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Camp Bonneville's premature EA....... |
Camp Bonneville is getting the 'rush' again by the regulated. Clark County officials are recognizing the recent EA is premature due to severe issues with a landfill on site (lack of enough data due to lack of enough investigation) and the lack of the EE/CA making assessment imposssible. The EA also failed in obtaining and including more concise information regarding the Troutdale Gravel Aquifer and Troutdale Sandstone Aquifer in which Clark County obtains the water for their citizens. Also lacking in information was the two contaminated plumes 'infecting' this water source at other locations within the county and the impact 'possible' when/if those plumes meet with the groundwater contamination within Camp Bonneville. It is important to note, it is RAB members who found this discrepancy not the regulated. Camp Bonneville has undergone a major 'lose' due to 9/11 when they lost their EPA contact to the Coast Guard a few months ago. The EPA rep was a 'champion' for Clark County's health issues regarding cleanup and methodology and was 'the voice' of protection for the health of every person in Clark County. No one around the 'RAB table' has seen, talked nor met this replacement. The Camp Bonneville RAB members have dwindled to very few in numbers due to what some might call 'dragging of the feet' by the regulated, though there are arguments from same that the 'dragging of the feet' is being done by the regulators (sound familiar to other RAB members out there?). Camp Bonneville's RAB also has a member, myself, who has moved to the other side of the U.S. who is still maintaining her status as active member through reading of documentation, talking with other members around the country and relaying this information via the internet to those RAB members who have a computer and e-mail and not attending meetings. It is the importance of these few tenacious people who are keeping everyone's 'nose to the grindstone' yet it is not enough. Pushing through a premature EA without proper investigations is unacceptable and such premature steps must stop by the regulated. This all comes down to money which is understandable. Our military and elected officials must stop 'this rush to justice' and become very honest. The BRAC and FUD sites must be fully characterized for I know not one that is not contaminated. Before rushing to 'document' and 'close the books' through such 'manuels' as the EA, the military must shoulder the blame for the contamination and not push off such land onto the unsuspecting civilians in those communities. The lack of money for cleanup is NO REASON to release these sites. These sites must NOT be released into the community and pushing through EA's is not the answer. Stella | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] DU munitions Next by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 454 | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] DU Munitions Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 454 |