From: | petestrauss1@attbi.com |
Date: | 25 Jan 2002 20:31:29 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] DU munitions |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Lenny: I often don't disagree with you, but I would not want to speculate that "qualitatively" a dirty nuke made of DU is comparable to the release of TCE from your average industrial or military facility. I am not a health physicist, but one would have to know particle size, particle energy, oxidation state and a range of other variables to assess the harm of a dirty nuke. We should assume that if this type of weapon were to be used, those responsible would attempt to make maximum impact, probably by detonation in a high population density area. Also, it is my understanding that DU is also a gamma emitter, albeit not a very strong one. Its also important to point out that almost the entire scientific community is in agreement that that there is no safe level of radiation exposure. A radioactive particle deposited in the lung can effect many cells. One cell gone awry can start uncontrolled cellular growth causing cancer. Peter | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] SF Airport runway mitigation Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Alaskan Scud launches cancelled | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] SF Airport runway mitigation Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] DU munitions |