From: | Dori Digenti <ddigenti@hampshire.edu> |
Date: | 29 Jan 2002 15:14:06 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] DU Munitions |
Hello. I wanted to support Lenny's post on DU munitions use in Iraq and in general as part of the US arsenal with a small anecdote. I was in a meeting a few years ago with an MIT professor who had just toured an advanced army munitions operation, and he was amazed at how high-tech it was; he said that there was "no credible threat in the world" to US military capabilities (this was pre-9/11, obviously). My point is, while tank-destroying DU munitions may be the most effective, the word "overkill" comes to mind. I'm aware that if one is on the front lines with incomplete intelligence info about the enemy, one doesn't want to be unprepared; at the same time, the long-term devastation of environments with advanced weapons creates another kind of threat which is even more unpredictable. This discussion goes more to sustainability than to cleanup, but if we want to make long-term change in the after-effects of war and military operations on the environment, I think it does become part of the current discussion. Interested in hearing more on this topic, Best, Dori Digenti ISIS/Hampshire College Military Waste Cleanup Program http://isis.hampshire.edu/mil/ | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] DU Munitions Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Jet Fuel study | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] DU Munitions Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] DU Munitions |