From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 21 Feb 2002 00:30:36 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 |
[POSTED BY JAMES WERNER] I am new to this listserve after serving in DOE for 8 years and 5 years before that at NRDC and for several years before that with a private consulting firm doing DOE work, I never had much time to look at extra stuff outside of required DOE reading and a little DOD reading. First, I am impressed that the listserve includes a wide variety of perspectives from people who do not always agree. CPEO's sponsorship of a listserv that provides a true dialogue is extraordinarily valuable. I hope the users appreciate how extraordinary this is. There is certainly nothing like it focusing on DOE issues, where critics and advocates usually talk to themselves rather than each other. It is a very unhealthy situation, and is fundamentally why DOE cleanup is so much slower and less efficient and effective, compared to DOD work, in general. Also, I will be shamelessly patriotic and say that this type of dialogue among people of diverse views is what is truly great about America. Nobody gets jailed or shot or punched in the nose (well, not usually). There are many cultures and countries where this type of dialogue does not occur. Also, DOE folks could take a lesson from this listserve, rather than reading the old Soviet playbooks. Second, regarding the issue of exemptions for federal facilities, the writer working for the USAF is right on about the imprecise rhetoric, but narrowly wrong about the facts, as applied to DOE, at least. Here are three exceptions for federal facilities: 1. Federal facilities remain exempt from Clean Water Act fines and penalties (see United States Dep't of Energy v. Ohio, 503 U.S. 607, 628 (1992)) The FFCAct only addressed the RCRA exemption. 2. DOE is exempt from external regulation for low-level radioactive waste disposal (see http://www.eh.doe.gov/extreg/) 3. DOE remains exempt from OSHA regulation and NRC-regulated operational nuclear safety (with a few exceptions such as the HLW vit plant and UMTRA sites. Many of us worked a lot from 1993-2001 to close these loopholes of exemptions and self-regulation, but needed a bit more time to finish the job. Many communities feel it is unjust that federal facilities remain immune to the same rules that private companies must abide by. Also, many feds feel it is unjust when regulators sometimes force federal facilities to do more cleanup than at comparable private situations (though there are examples where federal facilities get away with less because they are perceived to be long-time land users and there are examples where DOE contractors welcome the stricter cleanup requirements because they profit from the higher costs required). Maybe there is a correlation between the injustices felt. Sorry if my patriotism offends anyone, but I just swell up shamelessly when I see people engaged in activities (like tolerance for diversity of views) that Americans can be rightly proud of. Bully for CPEO for fostering this dialogue. Jim Werner | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Hawaiians revive Makahiki in Makua Valley Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 474 | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Hawaiians revive Makahiki in Makua Valley Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 |