From: | loc@icx.net |
Date: | 21 Feb 2002 17:01:28 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 |
It's good to hear from Jim Warner on the DOE issues. I know many people like myself who work on DOE issues do indeed subscribe to this list. Having both worked on DoD cleanups and DOE-related environmental policy, I see that there are many concerns common to cleanups at both facilities, especially the reuse issues and long-term stewardship. >>From the "big picture" perspective, it makes sense to pressure the federal government to remediate its contamination, no matter what agency caused it. Perhaps that activity should be taken out of the hands of DOE and DoD because it is so far from their actual missions that they really don't want to fund it or train their people to deal with it. What do other list subscribers think about turning all federal cleanups over to EPA or creating a new agency with a narrowly targeted mission? Would this meet your communities' needs better than the present system? I'd be interested in hearing the perceived pros and cons of this. Regards, Susan -- ..................................................... Susan L. Gawarecki, Ph.D., Executive Director Oak Ridge Reservation Local Oversight Committee We've moved! Please note our new address: 102 Robertsville Road, Suite B, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 ..................................................... |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Re: Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Ft. Devens taken off Superfund list | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 |