From: | themissinglink@eznetinc.com |
Date: | 21 Feb 2002 17:45:45 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 |
I would love to see the Lead Agency status taken away from the DoD. I have always said that it is a conflict of interest. They are the polluter and they are the financially responsible party so they should not be the ones taking the lead in analyzing the various alternatives. CERCLA and RCRA are legally mandated cleanup standards. Nothing else in the legal system would allow for even the appearance of a conflict of interest but here we have a very real conflict of interest. And in my opinion it shows in the types of arguments I see from the DoD in the Response to Public Comments, the Feasibility Study, and the Risk Assessment for Landfill 7 on the edge of Lake Michigan in a former ravine within a quickly eroding 30 foot high bluff. One example is that in the excavation option the DoD makes a big deal of the risk of exposure to air of the buried toxins while the risk of failure of the cap and bluff stabilization are never mentioned in the capping option. The DoD put a cap over this same landfill in 1982 but it failed due, in their opinion, to not being maintained properly. 14,000 gallons of leachate were going into Lake Michigan per day because of this failure which is why they were able to fast track and interim cap currently. My belief is that the failure of the previous cap was more due to the unstable geologic nature of a ravine and bluff than the lack of DoD stewardship but regardless it failed, so why does the Risk Assessment not cover the risk of failure of the capping option? Conflict of interest. They do not want to excavate under any scenario, even if the waste turns out to be so hazardous as to trigger land disposal restrictions(a possibility by their own admission) and require incineration before being moved to a properly planned landfill. So better to leave it in place near the source of 95% of this country's fresh water supply. Steven Pollack www.familyjeweler.com/fortweb.htm | |
References | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Ft. Devens taken off Superfund list Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 475 |