From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 10 Jul 2002 18:06:14 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] TCE standards |
I received a couple of comments pointing out that I (in my TCE posting) did not fully, accurately describe the process for translating a health risk assessment to a cleanup standard in the field. The following, from a federal employee, appears to describe the process much better. Lenny *** "The science of TCE toxicity aside for the moment, the health risk assessment is just the first step. After the HRA is approved, IRIS (EPA's data base of toxicity values) will have to be updated, after IRIS is updated, a rule making will be needed to change the MCL [Maximum Contaminant Level] from 5 ug/L [micrograms per liter] to 1 ug/L. This is not a done deal because there are several non-health (i.e., cost and technical practicability) factors that can be considered in setting the new MCL. After the MCL is proposed and adopted, it would then be a potential ARAR [Applicable and Relevant or Appropriate Requirement] at CERCLA sites. After that, it would be a site-by-site analysis to see if the new MCL is an an ARAR before the new cleanup goal would be applied. "I think that folks a jumping the gun on this one." -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Navy's training is essential Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Pentagon expands probe of 1960s chemical weapons tests | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] TCE standards Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] GAO says env. laws aren't getting in the way ofmilitary training |