From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 5 Nov 2002 16:30:53 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Los Angeles lawfirm files NTC Tidelands Trust lawsuit |
[POSTED BY John McNab <saveourntc@yahoo.com>] On Friday, November 1 2002, a complaint was filed in Sacramento Superior Court alleging illegal termination of Tidelands Trust protection at Naval Training Center (NTC). Los Angeles environmental public interest law firm Chatten-Brown and Associates filed this action on behalf of Save Our NTC, Inc. Tidelands are land that are below the 1879 high mean tide line, or all bay fill in San Diego Harbor and Mission Bay Park. Appropriate uses of Tidelands are parks, commercial maritime, airports and hotels. The most inappropriate use of tidelands is residential housing. Tidelands Trust is part of 4 million acres of protected public land overseen by the State Lands Commission yet under the protection of the judicial system. Tidelands are lands that under the State Constitution and by legal precedent cannot be legislated out of existence except in rare cases, where small parcels of land are valueless for trust purposes. Chatten-Brown states: The state?s common law public trust doctrine and California Constitution Article 10, Section 3, prohibits the abandonment of the public trust when lands remain valuable for trust purposes. The Constitution and common law allow the Legislature to transfer tidelands to municipalities, but not to abandon the public trust on large parcels of land that remain valuable to the public trust, with certain narrow exceptions that are not applicable in this case The California Constitution also contains a more specific prohibition on the transfer of public tidelands to private parties. California Constitution, Article X section 3, prohibits the sale or grant of tidelands within two miles of an incorporated city or town which were subject to the ebb and flow of the tide in 1879. (City of Long Beach v. Mansell (1970) 3 Cal.3d 462, 479.) The delegates to the California Constitutional Convention in 1879 added provisions to the California Constitution forbidding the alienation of public trust lands for private use because they were mindful of instances where private developers took public land for private purposes. (City of Long Beach v. Mansell (1970) 3 Cal.3d 462, 504-506.) Thus, the constitutional prohibition was adopted to prevent exactly the sort of acquisition of public trust lands by a private company like Corky McMillin which the City appears to be contemplating approving. Governor Gray Davis signed the extermination of Tidelands Trust at Naval Training Center, Steve Peace Senate Bill 698, in November 2001 despite a flood of calls protesting. Citizens consistently since have addressed in testimony and by letter the illegality of this action to the City and State. Former City Attorney John Witt also wrote before leaving office that Tidelands at NTC were protected lands. Like the 30-foot height limit law, current City Attorney Casey Gwinn has reinterpreted law to favor commercial developers. McMillin purchased about 70 acres of extinguished Tidelands for less than four dollars for uses prohibited by Tidelands ? residential housing and office buildings. Save Our NTC, Inc. also contests the land taken out of Tidelands Trust for the Public Safety Training Institute. This property was conveyed to the City under an economic benefit conveyance. This means the City can do whatever they want with it at any time. If the purpose was to keep the Public Safety Training Institute at Naval Training Center, the land would have been transferred under a public benefit conveyance and Tidelands Trust would still be retained with the Training Institute either receiving a waiver (like the day care center in the NTC park area) or modified to emphasize maritime police ?fire users. Instead, the city used title transfer to make it available for future residential and non-maritime commercial development. The City action taken at Naval Training Center opens up a Pandoras Box of implications statewide if allowed to stand. Dedicated public land environmentalists assumed are safe potentially could now come into play. In San Diego MCRD, the airport and North Island all substantially sit on Tidelands. Whether public purpose will continue at these sites rides greatly on this Tidelands action at NTC. Naval Training Center still has the opportunity to become a waterside Balboa Park, rebuilt for public use by citizens. Public use always has promised the benefit of the required highest long-term economic return and also the fastest financial return to the City of San Diego General Tax Fund. Your support of Tidelands legal action will enable a reclaimed public vision to be realized. To view the case or letter briefing precedent: www.ntcsd.org John McNab Save Our NTC 1333 29th St San Diego, CA 92102 ===== Save OUR NTC--http://www.ntcsd.org -a 501(c)(3) NON-PROFIT** 4295 Voltaire St. S.D.,CA 92107 #27 - saveourntc@yahoo.com Help us to preserve all of the Naval Training Center for all citizens who have paid their tax dollars to equip the center for public/government use. **WE ARE TAX DEDUCTIBLE** Now, more than ever, NTC is needed by our country to preserve and protect our democracy. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] question: what to do when AIr Force gives wrongdate for hearing Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Court to Take Agent Orange Case | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] question: what to do when AIr Force gives wrongdate for hearing Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Court to Take Agent Orange Case |