From: | UTOSI-Hdqrs@kc.rr.com |
Date: | 25 Nov 2002 18:52:21 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] New Perchlorate Policy |
At 09:53 AM 11/25/02 -0800, Lenny Siegel wrote: I avoided this language (excerpted below by Peter) in my original posting because the issues are complex and their resolution areuncertain. I'll take a stab at it now, but I welcome correction or clarification.Defense Environmental Restoration projects, as originally defined by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, generally include the characterization and cleanup of hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants; correction of environmental damage (such as unexploded ordnance on former ranges) that creates an imminent or substantial endangerment; Lenny at SFAAP the RAB can speak to the characterization and cleanup of hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants; correction of environmental damage (such as unexploded ordnance on former ranges) that creates an imminent or substantial endangerment; and demolition and removal of unsafe buildings and structures. But the RAB cannot speak to the demolition, burning and removal of unsafe buildings and structures or the removal of sewer lines that contain explosives due to building wash down or asbestos covered steam lines. This covers any thing that was in a building or a sewer line. Jim Oyler ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Foothill housing sparks debate Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Unexploded Arms Require Big Cleanup At 16,000 U.S. Sites | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] New Perchlorate Policy Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] New Perchlorate Policy |