From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 25 Nov 2002 23:15:33 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] State's bid to regulate rocket fuel contamination delayed |
[California] State's bid to regulate rocket fuel contamination delayed LOS ANGELES (AP) - A judge has delayed California's bid to become the first state to set drinking water standards for amounts of a rocket fuel ingredient that has polluted hundreds of wells, officials said Friday. Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Dzintra Janavs ordered state officials Thursday to submit a draft public health goal for the pollutant, called perchlorate, to a second round of review by scientists The level would be the amount the state considers safe to ingest but is not a drinking water standard. Under state law, that health goal was to be in place by Jan. 1 but will now be delayed at least several months while the review takes place, said Allan Hirsch, spokesman for the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Once completed, a second law requires California to translate that goal into a drinking water standard by Jan. 1, 2004. That would make it the first state in the nation to create such a regulation. That process, which takes into consideration the cost and feasibility of meeting the standard, will likely be delayed as well. Since 1997, perchlorate has been found to contaminate 284 water sources around California. It is also found in 19 other states, including Nevada, where a plant leaches hundreds of pounds of perchlorate into Lake Mead each day. A draft goal for California, announced in March, recommended that drinking water not contain more than 6 parts per billion of perchlorate. This article can be viewed at: http://www.bayarea.com/mld/bayarea/news/4583845.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Unexploded Arms Require Big Cleanup At 16,000 U.S. Sites Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Unexploded Arms Require Big Cleanup At 16,000 U.S. Sites | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Foothill housing sparks debate Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] IS FT. CHAFFEE AS SAFE AS THE ARKANSAS NATIONAL GUARD THINKS? |