From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 27 Nov 2002 07:00:53 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Conferees Oppose RDT&E Devolvement |
In the Conference Report on H.R. 4546, the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003, members of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees directed the Defense Department not to shift a collection of research, development, test, and evaluation programs to the armed services from the Office of Secretary of Defense. This appears to be a reprieve for two key environmental programs, the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program and Environmental Security Technology Certification Program. As I editorialized in September, these two programs have successfully targeted key environmental problems with innovative research and demonstration projects. Devolvement likely would have undermined their effectiveness. (See http://www.cpeo.org/lists/military/2002/msg14424.html.) The following excerpt from the Conference Report may be found in the Congressional Record (House of Representatives - November 12, 2002 - Page: H8400). Lenny Siegel *** Delegation of research, development, test, and evaluation programs and activities The conferees support the efforts of the Department of Defense to streamline and transform itself in order to more effectively modernize and achieve its mission. The conferees are concerned, however, about recent efforts to devolve numerous research, development, test, and evaluation (RDT&E) programs within the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to the services and defense components. In particular, the conferees note that several programs with significant congressional interest are being transferred out of OSD, many of which are managed by OSD at congressional direction. It is the conferees' understanding that these programs are being transferred to achieve staffing and budget goals within OSD, rather than to improve the execution or performance of the affected programs. The conferees believe that the level of support that these RDT&E programs will receive if managed by the services and defense components will be reduced without OSD oversight. In addition, many of these programs serve multiple military objectives, which may not be addressed if the programs are managed by the individual services or defense components. Therefore, the conferees direct the Secretary of Defense to halt any efforts to transition the following RDT&E programs to a particular service or defense component: (1) Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program; (2) Defense Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research; (3) Environmental Security Technology Certification Program; (4) In-House Laboratory Independent Research; (5) High Performance Computer Modernization Program; (6) High Energy Laser Program; (7) Mentor Protege Program; (8) University Research Initiative; (9) Foreign Comparative Test Program; and (10) Joint Robotics Program. The conferees direct the Secretary of Defense to provide notification to Congress prior to the delegation of research, development, test, and evaluation activities and programs from the Office of the Secretary of Defense to a service or other defense component outside of OSD. The conferees direct the Secretary to provide justification for any proposed delegations in the form of a mandated report. A report on a delegation of authority should include each of the following: (1) an identification of the Secretary of a military department or head of a defense agency or other element of the Department of Defense to whom the delegation is made; (2) an evaluation of how the delegation is expected to improve the efficiency and performance of the program or activity in accomplishing the stated goals and purposes of the program or activity; (3) a description of plans for continued supervision of the program by the Office of the Secretary of Defense to ensure that the program or activity has sufficient resources to accomplish its stated goals and purposes; and (4) an identification of any changes in existing law necessary to support the delegation and a request that such changes be enacted. The conferees note that any delegation of RDT&E activities or programs by the Secretary of Defense shall be subject to careful congressional scrutiny. Some of the programs proposed for delegation were established at the OSD level by statute and will require changes to such statutes or enactment of specific authorization enabling the Secretary of Defense to delegate the program, while others may involve strong congressional interest. The conferees expect the Secretary of Defense to consider these legal requirements and congressional interests in rendering a decision on devolvement. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Army misses some lessons from Tooele chemical weapons incinerator Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Can't see the forest for the trees | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Army misses some lessons from Tooele chemical weapons incinerator Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Can't see the forest for the trees |