From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 18 Feb 2003 17:16:20 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] California cuts oversight |
In a convoluted consequence of California's budget crunch, the oversight of many military cleanup projects within the state is being cut back. As a result cleanup activity is likely to be delayed. Ironically, the problem is NOT a shortage of money. California's oversight of military cleanup is generally conducted by the statewide Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the regional Water Boards. The Department of Defense reimburses these agencies for their costs under the Defense State Memorandum of Agreement (DSMOA) program. In the past there have been disputes between the military and the state over the magnitude of DSMOA fund transfers. That is NOT the problem today. Instead, as part of the state's response to an unprecedented budget shortfall, the governor's office has clamped personnel ceilings on most, if not all state department's. Thus, DTSC and the Water Boards have had to cut back on staffing levels. With fewer staff, they are unable, in a timely fashion, to process documents from the Armed Services and particularly the Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) program managed by the Army Corps of Engineers. Some Boards and DTSC, working with the military, have been able to juggle their resources to deal with the most pressing requirements, but some projects are on hold. This has only become a public issue on the Central Coast, where the Regional Water Board oversees cleanup at Fort Ord and the Monterey Airport FUDS. But it's an issue statewide, and the Defense cleanup programs are preparing to shift money outside the state because they cannot execute their programs without regulatory consultation. (And they should be complimented for rejecting the impulse to plow ahead without proper oversight.) Thus, in implementing a policy designed to save the state money, California is actually losing money, twice. First, by not making sufficient staff available to carry out DSMOA requirements, it is rejecting federal funding. Second, by slowing the pace of oversight - in many cases delaying project review until next fiscal year - the state is essentially forcing the Defense Department to divert larger sums of money to other states. A number of people within California's regulatory agencies recognize the problem, but it is apparently difficult for them to get the attention of the governor and high-level officials. That's understandable, given the massive financial crisis facing schools, child care, public safety, and health care. But this is a problem that can and should be fixed because a relatively simple modification in policy would actually protect public health and the environment while actually SAVING, not COSTING the state money. Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] trivia for the day: window caulking may contain asbestos Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Trash dump from 1940s is unearthed by workers | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] trivia for the day: window caulking may contain asbestos Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] California cuts oversight |