From: | cpeo <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 21 Apr 2003 14:35:08 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Toxics? What Toxics? |
My sympathy goes out to the community. This is a 'typical' conflict around the nation. My question: given the usage of El Toro and specific sites (landfills) has the gw (groundwater) been tested or are you getting the runaround? Stella ----- Original Message ----- _From: "CPEO Moderator" <cpeo@cpeo.org> To: <cpeo-military@igc.topica.com> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 12:56 PM Subject: [CPEO-MEF] Toxics? What Toxics? California ORANGE COUNTY WEEKLY Toxics? What Toxics? Agran and Irvine's about-face on El Toro contamination by Anthony Pignataro Depending on whatever's politically expedient at that moment, Irvine Mayor Larry Agran and other city officials have espoused radically different views on toxic contamination at the old El Toro Marine Corps Air Station. Sometimes they say the base is an environmental nightmare; other times it's prime park land. In an April 6 Los Angeles Times piece, reporter Jean O. Pasco identified a zone euphemistically called "Anomaly Area 3" that presents the first of what could be many land-development headaches plaguing the Great Park. It seems that part of the base is so contaminated the Navy won't even include it in the 3,500-acre land auction set to take place in June. Area Anomaly 3 is part of an old landfill on the base's northeastern corner, near the intersection of Irvine Boulevard and Marine Way. Approximately 800 feet long and 30 feet deep, the dump contains extremely hazardous construction debris and, the Navy says, dangerous levels of asbestos, arsenic, benzopyrene and petroleum hydrocarbons. According to Irvine's Great Park plan, the dumpsite would be smack in the middle of 1,100 homes. Unless Irvine wants to dump the houses and turn the site into an Asbestos Land theme park, this presents a major stumbling block. But these days, Irvine officials just don't see it. To them, nothing stands in the way of converting El Toro into a developer-friendly collection of homes, offices, big-box retail outlets and, if there's any land left, parks. An anonymous city official writing on Len Kranser's El Toro Information website asserted, "We do not see [the contaminated dump] as a problem." This article can be viewed at: http://www.ocweekly.com/ink/03/33/news-pignataro.php | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Battle of the env. breaks out as Pentagon urges fewer limits on Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] LANL Installing New Filter To Trap Perchlorate | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Toxics? What Toxics? Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Farmview developer appeals ZBA decision |