From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 1 Jul 2003 16:46:54 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | RE: [CPEO-MEF] Credibility Gap |
The following response was posted by Wayne Crist <WWCRIST@mactec.com> ______________________________________________________________ It is clear that most if not all government agency use taxpayer money to push philosophical positions - Positions that someone will disagree and resent. Tell me do you resent EPA marketing and lobbying their positions? Is educating the public to your particular position nothing more than marketing and depending on who you are talking to isn't it lobbying? Isn't it partisan when EPA markets and lobbies for laws that they will be responsible to interpret and enforce? Didn't EPA push hard when they had sympatric ears in Congress and the White house? I suggest such actions are part of their job. If they don't do it they are not doing what the taxpayers paying for? To resent the military trying (in their eyes) to reduce costs, simplify and provide more effective and realistic training is foolish. That is part of their job. It is our job is to weigh the evidence and take appropriate action. Having worked on both sides (private and DOD) I have found far more integrity on the DOD side to do the right thing. For instant based on your previous writings I could not see put you in role that would impact a military base's cleanup. Your thoughts are far too one-sided when it involves the military. You last statement implying the American military is purposely poisoning the country in attempt to defend your position is unnecessary and unbecoming. Wayne Crist ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] State extends lease review Next by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Credibility Gap | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] State extends lease review Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Credibility Gap |