From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 17 Sep 2003 14:46:09 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Residents' Federal Lawsuits Blocked |
Washington THE WASHINGTON POST Residents' Federal Lawsuits Blocked Weapons Tested In Spring Valley By Carol D. Leonnig Wednesday, September 17, 2003; Page B08 Residents of Spring Valley cannot hold the federal government legally responsible for toxic contamination lurking under their Northwest Washington neighborhood, where the U.S. Army tested and dumped hundreds of pounds of chemical munitions during World War I, a federal judge has ruled. The decision from U.S. District Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle, covering claims made by Spring Valley residents in three lawsuits, takes the government off the hook for what some advocates consider the largest environmental hazard in the District of Columbia's history. The ruling will likely be appealed. The judge left open the possibility of litigation against American University, which offered its 92-acre campus to the Army for weapons testing in 1917, and developers who sold former campus property to residents, allegedly without warning of dangers of arsenic and other contamination. "This is a horrible decision for residents of Spring Valley," said Patrick M. Regan, an attorney for a family whose property was once part of the university campus and was found to have hazardous levels of arsenic. "Property values there are plummeting. . . . But now the federal government gets to walk away." Several attorneys involved in the case said they expect appeals from residents as well as American University. The university had also sued the federal government after it was targeted by residents in litigation. Four lawsuits, including a class action, filed by Spring Valley residents last year claimed that the Army negligently stored and handled highly toxic chemicals -- including mustard gas, cyanide phosgene, arsenic and lewisite -- on the campus before the war ended in 1918. The suits also claimed the government later buried hazardous materials in pits and failed to warn people of environmental and health risks. The suits sought hundreds of millions of dollars in damages to compensate residents for health risks and loss of property value. Huvelle dismissed the class action suit in March. But three residents' suits remained. In her ruling, dated Sept. 10, Huvelle said the federal government is immune from those three suits -- or any like them -- because the Army and Environmental Protection Agency made discretionary decisions that cannot be challenged. This article can be viewed at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22097-2003Sep16.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Air Force ducking duty on asbestos Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Input urged on land plan | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Air Force ducking duty on asbestos Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Residents' Federal Lawsuits Blocked |