From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 5 Apr 2004 20:12:30 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Lowry AFB Compliance Order |
=========================================================== Your opinion counts! We're conducting a survey for a computer service/repair company. When you complete our survey, you will also be entered into a drawing for one of ten $100 prizes. Just click http://click.topica.com/caab6PVaVxieSa8wsBba/ Val Rad =========================================================== [This reply came from the the lawyer who served on the National Academy of Sciences Adaptive Site Management study. - LS] If you are looking for the state-of-the-art in assessing the risk from asbestos based on residential exposure, you might want to follow the World Trade Center health assessment. There is an expert panel that is reviewing the risk assessment prepared by EPA and CDC. There are bulk dust (the equivalent of soil) screening levels, regular dust screening levels and ambient air screening levels for asbestos and a host of other contaminants likely to be found in indoor air. The broader point is that this asbestos liability is another example of the DoD trying to avoid environmental liabilities. Unless the law changes, however, I see no principled way to interpret the existing laws as excluding DoD. In fact, it is clear that Congress did not exclude DoD. Of course, the sovereign (Congress and the President) can change the law. The preferred solution is to establish a reliable method or methods of maintaining long-term stewardship. As you remember, the Adaptive Site Management report of the National Academy had a good outline of some of the issues that should be addressed. In my view, leaving asbestos or anything else in place is more likely to be acceptable if there was a long-term fund to take over management/regulation/oversight of these sites. On asbestos, have you ever heard of a federal or state asbestos sediment standard? One of my partners has a not-for-profit brownfield redevelopment client who is thinking of taking over a site with asbestos and the Fish and Wildlife expert has asked if there is such a thing as an asbestos sediment standard or sediment screening level. I have never heard of one and I do not think asbestosis of the lungs is problem with fish. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org =========================================================== INSTANT CAR INSURANCE QUOTE! Save time, save money, and get the best deal. Get quote, buy, and print insurance cards online! http://click.topica.com/caab599aVxieSa8wsBbf/ Insurance4usa.com =========================================================== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: RE: Doctor from Camp Lujuene - and TCE Next by Date: Ravenna Fixed-Price Contracting Dispute | |
Prev by Thread: Lowry AFB Compliance Order Next by Thread: RE: Digest for cpeo-military@igc.topica.com, issue 971 |