From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 27 Apr 2004 23:35:52 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Bottled water and perchlorate |
=========================================================== Give Your Team Access to Their PCs from Anywhere. Increase productivity with a secure remote-access solution from GoToMyPC Pro. Stay in touch with your office. FREE TRIAL: http://click.topica.com/caab6awaVxieSa8wsBba/ ExpertCity =========================================================== Don't let Olin off the bottled water hook just yet By Tom Mulhern Gilroy Dispatch (Opinion) (CA) April 27, 2004 Last Wednesday's The Dispatch carried an article by Eric Leins reporting how Olin was asking the state of California to let it discontinue supplying bottled water to the residents of about 600 households because contamination levels tested below 6 parts per billion. I couldn't help but think that this is how the long battle against Olin will go. In fact, I'd be perplexed if it went any other way. It shouldn't surprise anyone that Olin would want to eliminate the million-dollars-a-year program of giving bottled water to South Valley residents. If you ran a company, wouldn't you look for ways to save money? But it does surprise me that their basis would be something as flimsy as an almost imperceptible change in the amount of perchlorates in the groundwater, rather than some major drop in levels. If there were some sort of trend - say if concentrations had dropped consistently from 50 parts per billion down to 25 and then to 10 and then to 6, then you might be inclined to say, "Well, the trend seems to be going in the right direction." But in this case, it seems that many of the wells that tested for contamination haven't been repeatedly retested, and the difference of 4 ppb, 5 ppb, or 6 ppb doesn't exactly scream "Big Change!" These cited differences could be testing errors, changes due to seasonal fluctuations in the aquifer because of winter runoff, or any number of statistical quirks? You'd expect more dramatic changes to occur before saying that the aquifer was on the road to recovery and that it's okay for people to drink the water again. ... for the entire column, see http://gilroydispatch.com/opinion/opinionview.asp?c=105742 -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org =========================================================== Let University of Phoenix make 2004 your year. Evening, weekend or FlexNet® classes ? over 130 locations. Look into our programs and get the degree that gets you going! http://click.topica.com/caab6aBaVxieSa8wsBbf/ UOP =========================================================== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: North Carolina base legislation Next by Date: Open Space/Anti-Encroachment Bond in southern Arizona | |
Prev by Thread: North Carolina base legislation Next by Thread: Open Space/Anti-Encroachment Bond in southern Arizona |