From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 2 Jul 2004 21:12:39 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Ft. Ord burn lessons learned |
Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Apply now for a No-Annual-Fee Discover® Platinum Card 0% Intro APR*, No Annual Fee, Up to 2% Cashback Bonus® award* Start Saving Today ? APPLY NOW! It's fast, easy and secure. http://click.topica.com/caacpgwaVxieSa8wsBba/DiscoverCard ------------------------------------------------------------------- Submitted by Vienna Merritt Moore <vs3trees@sbcglobal.net> LESSONS LEARNED? We got our Fort Ord Community Bulletin with the Prescribed Burn Review flashing "Lessons Learned from 2003 Prescribed Burns" Omitted were lessons about listening to the community. Almost 1500 citizens, Spreckels School District, Sierra Club, Central Coast Alliance on Health, HOPE- Helping Our Peninsula?s Environment, Monterey Bay Toxics Project, Toxics Action Coalition, Save Our Air Resources, Life 2000, Carmel Valley Women?s Network, and more rejected the burning and pleaded for a pre-action health assessment that would have clarified risks and possibly extinguished the burn plan. Over 500 people hand wrote letters to Congressman Sam Farr (D) asking for a health study in the form of an Environmental Impact Statement before the helicopters dropped napalm (alumagel) which ignited Fort Ord. Not only was the Army deaf to the public but they ignored at least one very important environmental law. The National Environmental Policy Act requires an Environmental Impact Statement to be carried out on any federal action that could have an environmental impact. The only way to get around this is have a categorical exclusion, which requires proof that there will be NO impact. Lessons learned from the past? The Army wrote in 1994, "bombs and projectiles ? will explode and send hot fragments some four thousand feet (4,000) and will start secondary fires "with 100 percent certainty!" How could this have been a controlled burn? I doubt that the fire breaks were 4,000 feet wide. NO Munitions-Related Contaminants in the air, the Army declared. Ever seen such colors come off a forest fire? Expert on the impacts emissions from ordnance have on human health and the environment and former Division Chief for the EPA, Bill Mitchell clearly spelled out the impossibility of monitoring air from the burns in his comments on the Army?s Remedial Investigative Feasibility Study (RI/FS), and Burn Plan. In addition Mitchell stated "the light-weight, sooty, black fluffy particulate material produced by the burning ? will serve as perfect hosts to transport the undestroyed or partially destroyed energetic materials a great distance from the burn site before depositing it onto surfaces. This contaminated particulate could be a very toxic material in itself and be a short and long term hazard to those conducting the UXO remediation after the burn and those living on the Monterey peninsula." Workable, safe alternatives to burning exist. This fact, the facts above and more were vacant from the Army?s Bulletin even though they were repeated over and over to the Army, EPA, California Department of Toxic Substance Control and our Congressman Sam Farr before the burning! "Lessons learned", I shook my head as I wondered if somebody had a learning disability or if we the public were the ones that had a hard lesson to learn. For more information contact: Vienna Merritt Moore Founder Say NO to Fort Ord TOXIC BURNINGS 831-384-7658 E-mail: Vs3trees@sbcglobal.net Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Save up to 67% on Omaha Steaks + Get 6 FREE Burgers and a FREE Cutlery Set + Cutting Board! http://click.topica.com/caacpgjaVxieSa8wsBbf/OmahaSteaks ------------------------------------------------------------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: NC Landing Field Dispute Next by Date: Oliktok Point DEW dump site | |
Prev by Thread: Ft. Ord burn lessons learned Next by Thread: Florida County Counters MacDill AFB Encroachment |