From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 14 Dec 2006 06:48:45 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Ft. A.P.Hill (VA) - Too little development? |
Bleak Hill?Editorial Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star (VA) December 13, 2006 No. The Army's intelligence is dated: Caroline County ideal for anti-terror command A LITTLE OVER a year ago, the Spotsylvania Board of Supervisors turned down local developer Tricord's proposal to build a 1,500-home subdivision at New Post. The main reason? Concern about the encroachment of development on Fort A.P. Hill, "Where America's Military Sharpens Its Combat Edge." Now the Army has announced that it may split its new anti-terrorist Asymmetric Warfare Group, sending 300 jobs to Maryland and consigning to A.P. Hill only the billetless role of training ground. Why? Because there's too little development around the fort. "Catch 22," it seems, never runs out of new chapters. Dear Department of the Army: You can't have it both ways. ... For the entire editorial, see http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2006/122006/12132006/243185 --
| |
Prev by Date: [Fwd: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Old Arizona bombing ranges] Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Former Trabuco Bombing Range (CA) | |
Prev by Thread: [Fwd: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Old Arizona bombing ranges] Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Former Trabuco Bombing Range (CA) |