From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 22 Feb 2007 06:39:16 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] JPL (CA) perchlorate responsibility |
NASA report exonerates JPL in pollution of 5 water wells By Elise Kleeman Pasadena Star-News (CA) February 21, 2007PASADENA - A NASA report quietly released late last month concludes that the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Superfund site did not pollute five city water wells shuttered because of perchlorate contamination. The report's conclusions could keep the city from receiving federal funding for the treatment plant required to reopen the wells. City officials estimate the plant would cost $2.2million to construct and $1.5 million annually to operate. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is currently funding cleanup at two Altadena wells tainted by the toxins, which leeched from waste pits used at JPL in the 1940s and '50s. A treatment plant for four more Pasadena wells is planned for completion in 2008. "We've had success with dealing with the first series of wells, and it really is no surprise that NASA would begin the discussion about the next series by raising a question of responsibility," said Mayor Bill Bogaard of the report. "I would say it's almost predictable." ... For the entire article, see http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/search/ci_5270649 -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Hill Air Force Base (UT) PCB investigation Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Pantex (TX) safety | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Hill Air Force Base (UT) PCB investigation Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Pantex (TX) safety |