From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 22 Feb 2007 06:42:28 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Pantex (TX) safety |
Safety alarms raised at nuclear weapons plantFederal investigators are looking into deteriorating conditions at the Pantex plant in Texas. Energy Department officials say there's no danger. By Ralph Vartabedian Los Angeles Times February 21, 2007AMARILLO, TEXAS - Electrical failures have shut down the plant. The roof has leaked. Decrepit machinery dates back more than 40 years. Safety lapses led inspectors to levy fines twice within two years. And employees, under deadline pressure, complain they are often worked past the point of exhaustion. If this factory were producing medical devices or refining gasoline, the conditions would be serious enough. But this is where they work on nuclear bombs. Pantex is the Energy Department's main nuclear weapons factory, a linchpin of the nation's defense for half a century. The nation no longer makes nuclear weapons, so the plant's chief roles are servicing them or dismantling them to meet the terms of disarmament pacts. On a 25-square-mile swath of the Texas Panhandle, a series of massive white concrete domes mark the places where live nuclear weapons are opened up. The rituals and procedures inside those cells are supposed to be as strict as in any operating room, part of a safety culture that reduces any chance of an accidental nuclear explosion to one in 100 million. ... For the entire article, see http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-na-pantex21feb21,1,716553.story?ctrack=1&cset=true -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] JPL (CA) perchlorate responsibility Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] 1994 Tungsten Study | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] JPL (CA) perchlorate responsibility Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] 1994 Tungsten Study |