From: | CHARLES PATRIZIA <CAPATRIZIA@phjw.com> |
Date: | 11 Jun 1998 11:22:35 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Re: "MOM AND POP" BROWNFIELDS -Reply |
Bruce's questions are good ones. In addition it seems to me that successful brownfields need to focus on whether the succeeding use is going to be profitable enough to make the effort worthwhile. That is, a brownfields project gets done not because there is some use that could be made of the property, but because that use creates enough overall benefit i) financially for the developer, so that the initial financing can be repaid; ii) financially for the operator, so that the business will operate and there is a source of revenue to pay the developer or the financing entity; and iii) for the community and other finance entities (industrial development bonds, pollution control bonds, regular bank or other financing). Otherwise, the developer won't go forward, the bonds won't sell, and no one will operate the facility. Small businesses, particularly storefronts with residential space over or adjacent, can be a vibrant part of a community. But how many brownfields are there that really are appropriate for that use. Is the brownfield parcel in an existing community that will generate business traffic for the storefront? What kind of clean up will be required -- as Bruce points out, residential clean up standards could increase the cost substantially, and most small businesses don't generate a lot of excess cash flow. Is it the best use of limited bonding authority to finance those types of businesses, which may have higher risk, and therefore cause the bonds to be priced higher, or to go after larger fish which can create greater employment? I think in part, I look at this issue from a very different perspective than Lenny does. Lenny sees the community needs, and wants to use brownfields redevelopment as part of community redevelopment. I applaud the sentiment, but must question whether its sensible to put community dollars into a project that can't sustain itself economically. If the parcel were cheap to redevelop, or the business base were there to do storefronts, there would be significant demand to do them. I don't see that demand. | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Re: "MOM AND POP" BROWNFIELDS -Reply Next by Date: Wisconsin activist looking for advice. | |
Prev by Thread: Re: "MOM AND POP" BROWNFIELDS -Reply Next by Thread: Re: "MOM AND POP" BROWNFIELDS -Reply |