From: | Charles Bartsch <cbartsch@nemw.org> |
Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:47:22 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Re: Revisiting the question of Brownfields Numeric Estimate |
I'd still be curious to see the methodology, especially regarding the estimates. Charlie Bartsch At 08:43 AM 3/23/99 -0800, you wrote: > >EPA/OSPS continues to work with our contractor to determine a reliable >estimate >of brownfields sites nationwide. We expect their final report to be available >by the end of July, 1999, and it should account for those sites (meeting EPA's >definition) currently being tracked by states, counties, and >municipalities, and >will also estimate, through a supportable methodology, the vast number of >abandoned and/or underutilized sites (also meeting EPA's definition) that fall >outside of existing databases or lists. We're still in the early stages of >information gathering, and there are some issues yet to be resolved, but we're >still shooting for July. > >Andrew Kreider >EPA/OSWER/OSPS >Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative >kreider.andrew@epa.gov >202-260-9192 > > > > > >ddurett@oncon.com on 03/22/99 08:08:52 PM > >Please respond to cpeo-brownfields@igc.org > > > > To: cpeo-brownfields@igc.org > > cc: > > > > Subject: Revisiting the question of Brownfields Numeric > Estimate > > > > > > > > >Has any additional info been gathered since this topic surfaced in early >January? > > > > > > > > > > > | |
Prev by Date: Re: Primacy and Its Dilemmas Next by Date: Re: Date term Brownfields first used | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Revisiting the question of Brownfields Numeric Estimate Next by Thread: Re: DC'S Relationship between BF Laws and RCRA |