From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 05 Dec 1998 17:37:01 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Oral Histories of Base Pollution |
ORAL HISTORY PROJECTS CAN PRESERVE VITAL INFORMATION ON PAST POLLUTION Former military base workers carry around in their heads enormous valuable knowledge about past environmental practices. Particularly if they were employed on site in the era before environmental statutes and protective practices, they know where the chemicals were dumped, where the explosives might be found, and in one case that I've heard third-hand, where the skeletons are buried. Good cleanup programs seek out these workers, and though they are not always accurate, they appear often to be more reliable than extant official records. Recently, for example, the San Antonio Express-News (November 22, 1998) cited a retired worker from Kelly Air Force Base, who every December would move "from one vat to the next on the ['Green Worm' 2,150-foot long] parts cleaner, opening valves to let tens of thousands of gallons of smelly black liquids flow into the ground." Often, however, the military does not seek such testimony. Maybe base officials want to avoid the bad news. After all, buried hazards don't always spread. And it costs to collect the information. Still, as these workers age or die, more and more information becomes irretrievable. As one person suggested last week at a subgroup meeting of the National Dialogue on Military Munitions, it would make sense to collect this information while it's still available, rather than wait until cleanup programs are ready to respond. Diverting money from actual remediation for such a large-scale effort would probably not be popular, but there may be other ways to collect the information. An installation can initiate oral history projects, to collect information on the base's past, the about property before it became a base, and on questionable environmental practices. There are already some such programs in place. For example, at Fort Carson, Colorado, the Army recently completed oral history projects on both the ranchers/farmers and Indians who lived there before it became a base. (See "Environmental Update," Army Environmental Center, Fall, 1998.) Where cultural resource funding doesn't cover such projects, it may be possible for the Defense Department to conduct the research at low cost by partnering with area colleges. Both the information collected and the skills learned in conducting interviews should prove valuable to those institutions and their students. Either this is an idea whose time has come, or will soon pass. Lenny Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: Re: Biological Warfare Agents (fwd) Next by Date: Re: Oral Histories of Base Pollution | |
Prev by Thread: Follow-up from Monitored Natural Attenuation Forum Next by Thread: Re: Oral Histories of Base Pollution |