From: | "Ted Henry" <icfke@toad.net> (by way of "cpeo@cpeo.org" <cpeo@cpeo.org>) |
Date: | Tue, 3 Aug 1999 12:50:02 -0700 (PDT) |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: Off-Base Sampling |
Original Message----- From: Ted Henry <icfke@toad.net> To: lsiegel@cpeo.org <lsiegel@cpeo.org> Date: Monday, August 02, 1999 10:23 AM Subject: Re: Off-Base Sampling Aberdeen Proving Ground has conducted off-post sampling. However, it should be understood that this effort has taken significant pressure from the community and its TAG consultants. The example that immediately comes to mind in groundwater flow near the Edgewood boundary. In a description at the RAB regarding a TCE plume in the area, contour data were provided with arrows showing water only flowing from off-post to on-post. Yet, the data actually suggested that groundwater may have been flowing off-post in a localized area. After 6 months of pressing the EPA and getting hydrogeological assessments conducted by the EPA and USGS, there was finally agreement that there was an area of flow moving off-post. 6 months. As you might have guessed, TCE was found at the boundary and then found in off-post sampling near the adjacent neighborhood. Most troublesome was the fact that minutes from an internal APG meeting dated before the 6 month battle began indicated that agencies at APG knew of the data suggesting groundwater flow off-post. There are other examples where APG did sample off-post, including surface water (although part of the Chesapeake Bay and the tributaries are considered APG property). So, APG has made some effort and work by the community has improved the quality of this sampling. For instance, APG did not sample for RAD contamination regularly until the citizens coalition and its consultants pressed for it. In short, the community efforts is a critical part of the process and military agencies will do the right thing, it just often takes pressure to ensure the "corners are not cut". Peace Ted Henry Community Outreach Specialist The IT Group 2113 Emmorton Park Road Edgewood, MD 21040 (410) 679-9939 - phone (410) 679-9940 - fax >-----Original Message----- >From: Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> >To: cpeo-military@igc.org <cpeo-military@igc.org> >Date: Sunday, August 01, 1999 8:17 PM >Subject: Off-Base Sampling > > >>A question came up today at our meeting of community members from Army >>Ammunition Plants. It actually applies to all military installation. >> >>Where there are indications of possible contamination migration, does >>the installation in your area conduct off-site sampling, of >>groundwater, surface water, and/or other media? >>-- >> >> >>Lenny Siegel >>Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight >>c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 >>Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 >>Fax: 650/968-1126 >>lsiegel@cpeo.org >>http://www.cpeo.org >> > > | |
Prev by Date: Re: Sunflower Army Munitions Plant - FOSET Next by Date: Re: Off-Base Sampling | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Off-Base Sampling Next by Thread: Re: Off-Base Sampling |